Literature DB >> 11890322

The DNA database search controversy.

David J Balding1.   

Abstract

A recent article in Biometrics (Stockmarr, 1999, 55, 671-677) has generated correspondence (56, 1274-1277; 57, 976-980) reigniting a controversy started by a 1996 report on DNA profile evidence issued by the U.S. National Research Council (NRC). The issue concerns the evidential weight of a DNA profile match when the match results from a search through a profile database. The views of both Stockmarr and the NRC report conflict with those of many statisticians working in the area, and the differing viewpoints lead to dramatically different assessments of evidence. I outline reasons why Stockmarr and the NRC report are wrong. I also briefly discuss possible reasons why forensic applications tend to be problematic for statisticians.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11890322     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00241.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  1 in total

1.  Average probability that a "cold hit" in a DNA database search results in an erroneous attribution.

Authors:  Yun S Song; Anand Patil; Erin E Murphy; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 1.832

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.