Literature DB >> 11890250

Experience with demucosalized ileum for bladder augmentation.

S V Lima1, L A Araújo, F O Vilar, D Mota, A Maciel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of demucosalized ileum for bladder augmentation, following the same principles previously used with the sigmoid colon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with bladder exstrophy or a neurogenic bladder had their bladders augmented with demucosalized ileum instead of the sigmoid colon, but following the same technique. The use of a Foley catheter with an inflated balloon greatly facilitated the dissection of the mucosa from the muscle. A silicone model, inserted in the bladder, was used to avoid shrinkage of the patch. An animal model was also used for total bladder replacement following the same principle.
RESULTS: The mean (range) follow-up was 15.4 (2-25) months. There was a significant increase in bladder compliance in all patients. A bladder of good shape and compliance was obtained in the animal model, with epithelial growth detected in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Demucosalized ileum can be used safely for bladder augmentation in the same way as with the sigmoid colon. The distension of the isolated patch greatly facilitates dissection between the mucosa and muscle. The animal model supported this method of bladder replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11890250     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.lima.2465.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bladder biomechanics and the use of scaffolds for regenerative medicine in the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ajalloueian; Greg Lemon; Jöns Hilborn; Ioannis S Chronakis; Magdalena Fossum
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Aerosol transfer of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells onto demucosalized colonic segments for bladder augmentation: in vivo, long term, and functional pilot study.

Authors:  Guy Hidas; Hak J Lee; Andrej Bahoric; Maryellen S Kelly; Blake Watts; Zhongbo Liu; Samah Saharti; Achim Lusch; Alireza Alamsahebpour; David Kerbl; Hung Truong; Xiaolin Zi; Antoine E Khoury
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 3.  Alternatives to conventional enterocystoplasty in children: a critical review of urodynamic outcomes.

Authors:  Ricardo González; Barbara M Ludwikowski
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Outcomes of seromuscular bladder augmentation compared with standard bladder augmentation in the treatment of children with neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Xiao-Gang Sun; Yan-Xia Li; Long-Fei Ji; Jia-Long Xu; Wei-Xiu Chen; Ruo-Yi Wang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.534

5.  Bladder augmentation: Review of the literature and recent advances.

Authors:  Serhat Gurocak; Jody Nuininga; Iyimser Ure; Robert P E De Gier; Mustafa Ozgur Tan; Wouter Feitz
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-10

Review 6.  The evolution of bladder augmentation: from creating a reservoir to reconstituting an organ.

Authors:  Roman Jednak
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.418

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.