Literature DB >> 11890165

Measuring portal venous perfusion with contrast-enhanced CT: comparison of direct and indirect methods.

Yoshito Tsushima1, Martin J K Blomley, Shoichi Kusano, Keigo Endo.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Two algorithms can be used to measure portal venous perfusion (PVP) with contrast material-enhanced single-level liver computed tomography. The "direct" and "indirect" algorithms use data from the portal vein and aorta, respectively. This study compared PVP values obtained with direct and with indirect algorithms in a series of patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both techniques were applied in 27 patients with cirrhosis (14 men and 13 women; mean age, 56.1 years +/- 9.4) and 18 control patients (seven men and 11 women; 52.8 years +/- 12.3). A single section through the liver was scanned after intravenous injection of ioversol (40-mL bolus; 320 mg of iodine per milliliter).
RESULTS: Both techniques showed reduced PVP in patients with cirrhosis (0.63 for direct and 0.17 for indirect method) compared with control patients (1.06 and 0.26, respectively), but only the direct method agreed with physiologic expectations based on animal and human studies. In separating cirrhotic and control patients, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly greater for the direct method (0.91 vs 0.78; P = .03).
CONCLUSION: Both direct and indirect methods are feasible and distinguish well between cirrhotic and control patients, but the direct method is more physiologic and is preferable if portal venous data are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11890165     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80370-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: feasibility of a prolonged dual-phase imaging protocol with tracer kinetics modeling.

Authors:  Tong San Koh; Choon Hua Thng; Septian Hartono; Puor Sherng Lee; Su Pin Choo; Donald Y H Poon; Han Chong Toh; Sotirios Bisdas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Shear wave velocity might correlate with portal venous perfusion if correct portal venous perfusion techniques are used.

Authors:  Yoshito Tsushima; Ayako Taketomi-Takahashi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Response to the Letter: Shear wave velocity might correlate with portal venous perfusion if correct portal venous perfusion techniques are used.

Authors:  Michael Esser; Marius Horger
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 4.  Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.

Authors:  Choon Hua Thng; Tong San Koh; David J Collins; Dow Mu Koh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The use of perfusion CT for the evaluation of therapy combining AZD2171 with gefitinib in cancer patients.

Authors:  Martijn R Meijerink; Hester van Cruijsen; Klaas Hoekman; Matthijs Kater; Cors van Schaik; Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe; Giuseppe Giaccone; Radu A Manoliu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Total-liver-volume perfusion CT using 3-D image fusion to improve detection and characterization of liver metastases.

Authors:  Martijn R Meijerink; Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe; Lineke van der Weide; Petrousjka van den Tol; Sybren Meijer; Cornelis van Kuijk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Robustness to noise of arterial blood flow estimation methods in CT perfusion.

Authors:  Maria Romano; Michela D'Antò; Paolo Bifulco; Francesco Fiore; Mario Cesarelli
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-08-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.