Literature DB >> 11889904

In vivo studies of monoclonal anti-D and the mechanism of immune suppression.

Belinda M Kumpel1.   

Abstract

Administration of anti-D immunoglobulin to D- women after delivery of a D+ infant has dramatically reduced the number of immunised women and cases of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. The use of monoclonal anti-D might alleviate some of the pressures on maintaining adequate supplies of plasma sourced anti-D. Two human monoclonal antibodies, BRAD-3 (IgG1) and BRAD-5 (IgG3), with proven activity in in vitro functional (immunological) assays with cells bearing IgG Fc receptors (Fc gamma R) were selected for clinical studies. They were prepared by purification of IgG secreted by culture of the Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B cell lines in hollow fibre bioreactors. The clearance of D+ red cells injected into D- subjects was accelerated by prior injection of the monoclonal antibodies, both individually and blended (3:1, BRAD-5: BRAD-3). The subjects were protected from Rh D immunisation. A large multicentre study evaluated the BRAD-3/5 blend for its ability to prevent Rh D immunisation in 95 D- subjects given 400 micrograms i.m. 24 hours after injection of 5 ml D+ red cells. Challenge injections of D+ red cells alone were given 24 and 36 weeks later, and blood samples were taken every 4 weeks from the subjects throughout the study for detection of anti-D responses. There was one definite and one possible failure of protection; in one subject the plasma anti-D level rose from week 12 onwards, and in another individual rapid seroconversion was observed at week 28. Considering the relatively large dose of red cells and the number of subjects studied, it was concluded that the failure rate was much lower than in routine Rh D prophylaxis. The responder rate was 13% by week 36 and 24% by week 48. The low percentage of responders and the modest levels of endogenous anti-D produced suggested that administration of monoclonal anti-D had induced long-term specific suppression of anti-D responses in these subjects. The most likely mechanism of action was considered to be inhibition of B cells resulting from co-crosslinking antigen receptors with inhibitory Fc gamma R when the B cells contacted red cells that had bound passive anti-D.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11889904     DOI: 10.1016/s1246-7820(01)00209-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Clin Biol        ISSN: 1246-7820            Impact factor:   1.406


  4 in total

1.  The fine specificity of IgM anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) is different from that of IgG ACPA.

Authors:  Parawee Suwannalai; Annemiek Willemze; Linda van Toorn; Gerrie Stoeken-Rijsbergen; Nivine Levarht; Jan Wouter Drijfhout; Tom W J Huizinga; Rene E M Toes; Leendert A Trouw
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.156

2.  Risky Bodies in the Plasma Bioeconomy: A Feminist Analysis.

Authors:  Julie Kent; Anne-Maree Farrell
Journal:  Body Soc       Date:  2015-03

3.  Anti-rhesus D prophylaxis in pregnant women is based on sialylated IgG antibodies.

Authors:  André Winkler; Markus Berger; Marc Ehlers
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-08-09

4.  Anti-D monoclonal antibodies from 23 human and rodent cell lines display diverse IgG Fc-glycosylation profiles that determine their clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Belinda M Kumpel; Radka Saldova; Carolien A M Koeleman; Jodie L Abrahams; Agnes Hipgrave Ederveen; Kathryn L Armour; Natalia I Olovnikova; Gestur Vidarsson; Rick Kapur; Pauline M Rudd; Manfred Wuhrer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.