Literature DB >> 11889289

A computerized tool for evaluating the effectiveness of preventive interventions.

G Daumit1, L E Boulware, N R Powe, C S Minkovitz, K D Frick, L A Anderson, G R Janes, R S Lawrence.   

Abstract

In identifying appropriate strategies for effective use of preventive services for particular settings or populations, public health practitioners employ a systematic approach to evaluating the literature. Behavioral intervention studies that focus on prevention, however, pose special challenges for these traditional methods. Tools for synthesizing evidence on preventive interventions can improve public health practice. The authors developed a literature abstraction tool and a classification for preventive interventions. They incorporated the tool into a PC-based relational database and user-friendly evidence reporting system, then tested the system by reviewing behavioral interventions for hypertension management. They performed a structured literature search and reviewed 100 studies on behavioral interventions for hypertension management. They abstracted information using the abstraction tool and classified important elements of interventions for comparison across studies. The authors found that many studies in their pilot project did not report sufficient information to allow for complete evaluation, comparison across studies, or replication of the intervention. They propose that studies reporting on preventive interventions should (a) categorize interventions into discrete components; (b) report sufficient participant information; and (c) report characteristics such as intervention leaders, timing, and setting so that public health professionals can compare and select the most appropriate interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11889289      PMCID: PMC1913681          DOI: 10.1093/phr/116.S1.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  14 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Worksite wellness programs: incremental comparison of screening and referral alone, health education, follow-up counseling, and plant organization.

Authors:  J C Erfurt; A Foote; M A Heirich
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Implementing preventive services: to what extent can we change provider performance in ambulatory care? A review of the screening, immunization, and counseling literature.

Authors:  L A Anderson; G R Janes; C Jenkins
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1998

4.  Evaluation of the IMPACT blood pressure program.

Authors:  J E Fielding; K Knight; T Mason; R C Klesges; K R Pelletier
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1994-07

5.  Controlled trial of biofeedback-aided behavioural methods in reducing mild hypertension.

Authors:  C Patel; M G Marmot; D J Terry
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-06-20

6.  Relaxation behavior therapy as sole treatment for mild hypertension.

Authors:  M J Irvine; A G Logan
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Relaxation training for essential hypertension at the worksite: II. The poorly controlled hypertensive.

Authors:  W S Agras; C B Taylor; H C Kraemer; M A Southam; J A Schneider
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 8.  Clinicians and patients with hypertension: unsettled issues about compliance.

Authors:  P Rudd
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Hypertension control at the work site. Comparison of screening and referral alone, referral and follow-up, and on-site treatment.

Authors:  A Foote; J C Erfurt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-04-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Non-drug treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.