Literature DB >> 11889237

Does dichotic listening probe temporal lobe functions?

L Jäncke1, N J Shah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore cortical hemodynamic responses using fMRI in the context of three dichotic listening tasks.
BACKGROUND: Dichotic listening is a widely used behavioral technique indicating brain laterality during which subjects are presented with two different auditory signals at the same time, one arriving at each ear. fMRI offers the potential to explore the hemodynamic response during dichotic listening and to relate the behavioral indices with these cortical measures.
METHOD: fMRI was performed for 10 right-handed normal subjects listening to consonant-vowel syllable pairs with the task of detecting a "target" syllable by pressing a button. The target stimulus appeared equally often in the left and right ear. The subjects were instructed to either concentrate on the stimuli presented in both ears (DIV) or only in the left ear (FL) or right ear (FR). In addition, a control condition was used during which the syllables were presented binaurally. Hemodynamic responses were measured by applying whole-head echo planar imaging techniques and statistically analyzed by using statistical parametric mapping (SPM99) software.
RESULTS: During dichotic listening, there were generally extended activations in frontotemporal networks. For the DIV condition, the authors found strong bilateral activations in the inferior frontal gyrus, Broca's area, the left middle frontal gyrus, and in the left superior temporal gyrus. During the FL condition, there was an additional cluster in the right inferior frontal gyrus. For the FR condition, there were stronger activations in Broca's area and the left superior temporal gyrus.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings were taken as evidence that dichotic listening is more demanding, requiring more processing capacity distributed in frontotemporal networks. The behavioral measures of dichotic listening were not simply a function of temporal lobe activation. Rather, the cortical activations support the notion that different processing strategies controlled by different neural structures are applied during dichotic listening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11889237     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.58.5.736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  23 in total

1.  Relationships between trait impulsivity and cognitive control: the effect of attention switching on response inhibition and conflict resolution.

Authors:  Rotem Leshem
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-06

2.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging measure of automatic and controlled auditory processing.

Authors:  Teresa V Mitchell; Rajendra A Morey; Seniha Inan; Aysenil Belger
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neuromagnetic functional coupling during dichotic listening of speech sounds.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Stefania Della Penna; Claudio Babiloni; Fabrizio Vecchio; Paolo Capotosto; Davide Rossi; Raffaella Franciotti; Kathya Torquati; Vittorio Pizzella; Paolo M Rossini; Gian Luca Romani
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Corpus callosum functioning in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after surgery.

Authors:  Maria Mataró; Maria Antonia Poca; Mar Matarín; Juan Sahuquillo; Nuria Sebastián; Carme Junqué
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  Jie Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The effects of the glutamate antagonist memantine on brain activation to an auditory perception task.

Authors:  Heidi van Wageningen; Hugo A Jørgensen; Karsten Specht; Tom Eichele; Kenneth Hugdahl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in audiovisual processing.

Authors:  Julia Hocking; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Executive function orchestrates regulation of task-relevant gait fluctuations.

Authors:  Leslie M Decker; Fabien Cignetti; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Auditory attentional control and selection during cocktail party listening.

Authors:  Kevin T Hill; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.