Literature DB >> 11888164

Comparative degradation of oomycete, ascomycete, and basidiomycete cell walls by mycoparasitic and biocontrol fungi.

G D Inglis1, L M Kawchuk.   

Abstract

Fourteen fungi (primarily representing mycoparasitic and biocontrol fungi) were tested for their ability to grow on and degrade cell walls (CWs) of an oomycete (Pythium ultimum), ascomycete (Fusarium equisetii), and basidiomycete (Rhizoctonia solani), and their hydrolytic enzymes were characterized. Protein was detected in the cultural medium of eleven of the test isolates, and these fungi significantly degraded CWs over the 14-day duration of the experiment. In general, a greater level of CW degradation occurred for F. equisetii and P. ultimum than for R. solani. Fungi that degraded F. equisetii CWs were Coniothyrium minitans, Gliocladium roseum, Myrothecium verrucaria, Talaromyces flavus, and Trichoderma harzianum. Taxa degrading P ultimum CWs included Chaetomium globosum, Coniothyrium minitans, M. verrucaria, Seimatosporium sp., Talaromyces flavus, Trichoderma hamatum, Trichoderma harzianum, and Trichoderma viride. Production of extracellular protein was highly correlated with CW degradation. Considerable variation in the molecular weights of CW-degrading enzymes were detected among the test fungi and the CW substrates in zymogram electrophoresis. Multivariate analysis between CW degradation and hydrolysis of barley beta-glucan (beta1,3- and beta1,4-glucanases), laminarin (beta1,3- and beta1,6-glucanases), carboxymethyl cellulose (endo-beta1,4-glucanases), colloidal chitin (chitinases), and chitosan (chitosanases) was conducted. For F. equisetii CWs, the regression model accounted for 80% of the variability, and carboxymethyl cellulases acting together with beta-glucanases contributed an R2 of 0.52, whereas chitinases and beta-glucanases alone contributed an R2 of 0.11 and 0.12, respectively. Only 61% of the variability observed in the degradation of P. ultimum CWs was explained by the enzyme classes tested, and primarily beta-glucanases (R2 of 0.53) and carboxymethyl cellulases (R2 of 0.08) alone contributed to CW break down. Too few of the test fungi degraded R. solani CWs to perform multivariate analysis effectively. This study identified several fungi that degraded ascomyceteous and oomyceteous, and to a lesser extent, basidiomycetous CWs. An array of enzymes were implicated in CW degradation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11888164     DOI: 10.1139/w01-130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Microbiol        ISSN: 0008-4166            Impact factor:   2.419


  14 in total

1.  Improvement of the fungal biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride to enhance both antagonism and induction of plant systemic disease resistance.

Authors:  Kurt Brunner; Susanne Zeilinger; Rosalia Ciliento; Sheridian L Woo; Matteo Lorito; Christian P Kubicek; Robert L Mach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Conferred resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Lilium by overexpression of the RCH10 chitinase gene.

Authors:  Francisco F Núñez de Cáceres González; Michael R Davey; Ester Cancho Sanchez; Zoe A Wilson
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Characterization of mycolytic enzymes of Bacillus strains and their bio-protection role against Rhizoctonia solani in tomato.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Solanki; Amrita Shalini Robert; Rajesh Kumar Singh; Sudheer Kumar; Akhilesh Kumar Pandey; Alok K Srivastava; Dilip K Arora
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Proteomic response of the biological control fungus Trichoderma atroviride to growth on the cell walls of Rhizoctonia solani.

Authors:  Jasmine Grinyer; Sybille Hunt; Matthew McKay; Ben R Herbert; Helena Nevalainen
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 3.886

5.  Three endochitinase-encoding genes identified in the biocontrol fungus Clonostachys rosea are differentially expressed.

Authors:  Mojtaba Mamarabadi; Birgit Jensen; Mette Lübeck
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  Community structure of actively growing bacterial populations in plant pathogen suppressive soil.

Authors:  Karin Hjort; Antje Lembke; Arjen Speksnijder; Kornelia Smalla; Janet K Jansson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.192

7.  Soil bacterial community shifts after chitin enrichment: an integrative metagenomic approach.

Authors:  Samuel Jacquiod; Laure Franqueville; Sébastien Cécillon; Timothy M Vogel; Pascal Simonet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Metalloprotease, Mpr1, Engages AnnexinA2 to Promote the Transcytosis of Fungal Cells across the Blood-Brain Barrier.

Authors:  Sarisa Na Pombejra; Michelle Salemi; Brett S Phinney; Angie Gelli
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Identification of antifungal principle in the solvent extract of an endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum from Withania somnifera.

Authors:  Susheel Kumar; Nutan Kaushik; Peter Proksch
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-02-06

10.  Disruption of the Eng18B ENGase gene in the fungal biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride affects growth, conidiation and antagonistic ability.

Authors:  Mukesh K Dubey; Wimal Ubhayasekera; Mats Sandgren; Dan Funck Jensen; Magnus Karlsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.