Literature DB >> 11888099

A randomised comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter.

Roni Levy1, Asaf Ferber, Alon Ben-Arie, Beatrice Paz, Ynon Hazan, Isaac Blickstein, Zion J Hagay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ripening of the cervix with a Foley catheter commonly results in cervical dilatation without contractions. We examined the outcome of labour in women who underwent induction of labour using a Foley catheter, followed by either 1. early amniotomy, or 2. augmentation of labour by oxytocin and late amniotomy.
DESIGN: Prospective randomised clinical trial.
SETTING: Labour and delivery ward of a university teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women > or =38 weeks of a singleton gestation, who had had no prior caesarean section.
METHODS: All women underwent cervical ripening using a Foley catheter. Following removal of the catheter, women were randomly assigned to either early (n = 80) or late amniotomy (n = 88). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of mode of delivery and duration of labour between the two groups.
RESULTS: The rate of caesarean section was significantly higher in the early amniotomy group compared with the late amniotomy group (25% vs 7.9%; relative risk 1.74; 95% CI 1.3 - 2.34). The increase in caesarean section rate was due primarily to dystocia (15% vs 3.3%; relative risk 1.8; 95% CI 1.32 - 2.45). When excluding caesarean deliveries, no significant difference was found in duration of labour between the groups (8.3 hours (3.8) vs 7.7 hours (2.9)).
CONCLUSIONS: In women who undergo cervical ripening with a Foley catheter, augmentation of labour by oxytocin followed by amniotomy during active labour results in a lower rate of caesarean delivery for dystocia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11888099     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01137.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  3 in total

1.  The Association between Early Artificial Amniotomy and Chorioamnionitis in Nulliparous Induction of Labor.

Authors:  Laura G Cooney; Jamie A Bastek
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-12-16

2.  Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Associated with Amniotomy among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Labor Induction at Term.

Authors:  Ashley N Battarbee; Grecio Sandoval; William A Grobman; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Robert M Silver; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Ronald J Wapner; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; Suneet P Chauhan; Jay D Iams; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Ronald S Gibbs; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.