Literature DB >> 11887906

The economic impacts of the tobacco settlement.

David M Cutler1, Jonathan Gruber, Raymond S Hartman, Mary Beth Landrum, Joseph P Newhouse, Meredith B Rosenthal.   

Abstract

Recent litigation against the major tobacco companies culminated in a master settlement agreement (MSA) under which the participating companies agreed to compensate most states for Medicaid expenses. Here the terms of the settlement are outlined and its economic implications analyzed using data from Massachusetts. The financial compensation to Massachusetts (and other states) under the MSA is substantial. However, this compensation is dwarfed by the value of the health impacts induced by the settlement. Specifically, Medicaid spending will fall, but only by a modest amount. More importantly, the value of health benefits ($65 billion through 2025 in 1999 dollars) from increased longevity is an order of magnitude greater than any other impacts or payments. The net efficiency implications of the settlement turn mainly on a comparison of the value of these health benefits relative to a valuation of the foregone pleasure of smoking. To the extent that the value of the health benefits is not offset by the value of the pleasure foregone, the economic impacts of the MSA will include a share of these health benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11887906     DOI: 10.1002/pam.1037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage        ISSN: 0276-8739


  13 in total

1.  Smoking attributable medical expenditures, years of potential life lost, and the cost of premature death in Taiwan.

Authors:  M C Yang; C Y Fann; C P Wen; T Y Cheng
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Funding of North Carolina tobacco control programs through the Master Settlement Agreement.

Authors:  Alison Snow Jones; W David Austin; Robert H Beach; David G Altman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Occupational disease and workers' compensation: coverage, costs, and consequences.

Authors:  J Paul Leigh; John A Robbins
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  The social costs of uranium mining in the US Colorado Plateau cohort, 1960-2005.

Authors:  Benjamin A Jones
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Estimates and projections of value of life lost from cancer deaths in the United States.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Cathy J Bradley; Angela B Mariotto; Martin L Brown; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  What are the health costs of uranium mining? A case study of miners in Grants, New Mexico.

Authors:  Benjamin A Jones
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-10

7.  Understanding differences in health behaviors by education.

Authors:  David M Cutler; Adriana Lleras-Muney
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.804

8.  Cigarette taxes and smoking participation: evidence from recent tax increases in Canada.

Authors:  Sunday Azagba; Mesbah Sharaf
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Tobacco Regulation and Cost-Benefit Analysis: How Should We Value Foregone Consumer Surplus?

Authors:  Helen G Levy; Edward C Norton; Jeffrey A Smith
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2018-01-23

10.  When health policy and empirical evidence collide: the case of cigarette package warning labels and economic consumer surplus.

Authors:  Anna V Song; Paul Brown; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 11.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.