Literature DB >> 11887377

Moisture-insensitive adhesives: reactivity with water and bond strength to wet and saliva-contaminated enamel.

T Eliades1, E Katsavrias, G Eliades.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reactivity with water of a moisture-insensitive orthodontic primer (Transbond MIP), in conjunction with a no-mix orthodontic adhesive (Unite), and a moisture-insensitive adhesive (Smartbond), and to assess their bond strength to wet and saliva-contaminated enamel relative to the conventional application of the no-mix adhesive. The reactivity of the moisture-insensitive products with water was investigated by micro-multiple internal reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (micro-MIR FTIR). Sixty premolars were divided into two groups of 30 teeth each and, on the buccal enamel surfaces, a standardized volume (0.1 ml) of water or fresh whole saliva was applied. Standard edgewise stainless steel brackets were then bonded to enamel surfaces as follows: (a) Unite, (b) Unite with the Transbond MIP, and (c) Smartbond. The brackets were debonded under shear force at a speed of 2 mm/min and the debonded enamel surfaces were subjected to fractographic analysis. The statistical analysis of the bond strength values was performed by two-way ANOVA with condition (water, saliva) and adhesive type serving as discriminating variables (n = 10, alpha = 0.05). The results of the fractographic analysis were evaluated by chi 2 test (alpha = 0.05). FTIR analysis showed that only Smartbond set in the presence of water. Application of water in Transbond MIP increased the extent of carboxyl ionization without inducing any setting reaction. Transbond MIP did not improve bond strength values when combined with the no-mix adhesive. Most adhesive-enamel condition combinations showed a trend to present lower bond strength in the presence of saliva; however, this was not confirmed statistically. Fractography of enamel and bracket base surfaces showed that Unite + Transbond MIP resulted in the most adhesive fractures (leaving no resin on enamel surface), whereas Smartbond presented the highest frequency of cohesive fractures (adhesive left on bracket and enamel surfaces).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11887377     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/24.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  3 in total

1.  Invitro Study of the Effect of Different Samples of Water Used for Washing the Etchant on Bracket Bond Strength.

Authors:  Sandesh Phaphe; Chanamallappa Ganiger; Yusuf Ahammed; Pratap Mane
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-10-01

2.  Shear bond strength comparison of moisture-insensitive primer and self-etching primer.

Authors:  Arunima Goswami; Borah Mitali; Bk Roy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-07

3.  A Novel Evaluation Method for Detecting Defects of the Bonded Orthodontic Bracket-Tooth Interface.

Authors:  Mona Aly Abbassy; Turki A Bakhsh; Ahmed Samir Bakry
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.