OBJECTIVES: To determine the adequacy of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) for assessing pain impact after spinal cord injury (SCI) and to determine whether the impact of pain can be separated from other consequences of SCI. DESIGN: Postal survey. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 159 subjects contacted who experienced chronic pain, 120 (75.5%) participated. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were mailed the original MPI and a set of additional items specific to SCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The MPI. RESULTS: Confirmatory (CFA) and exploratory factor analyses were performed for each section of the MPI. Elimination of several items, including those related to work in section 1 (pain impact), improved the goodness-of-fit index (GFI). A CFA for section 2 (response of significant other) resulted in acceptable GFI after 2 items were deleted. Decrease in activity levels (section 3) because of other consequences of injury was significantly greater after tetraplegia than after paraplegia. In contrast, pain-related reduction in activities was not associated with injury level. Although other consequences of SCI may have greater impact on activities than pain, severe pain is likely to affect activity levels significantly. CONCLUSION: The MPI appears to be appropriate for use in a SCI population when modified to eliminate questions related to work and to supplement the activity scale with items addressing decreased activity levels due to pain. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
OBJECTIVES: To determine the adequacy of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) for assessing pain impact after spinal cord injury (SCI) and to determine whether the impact of pain can be separated from other consequences of SCI. DESIGN: Postal survey. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 159 subjects contacted who experienced chronic pain, 120 (75.5%) participated. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were mailed the original MPI and a set of additional items specific to SCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The MPI. RESULTS: Confirmatory (CFA) and exploratory factor analyses were performed for each section of the MPI. Elimination of several items, including those related to work in section 1 (pain impact), improved the goodness-of-fit index (GFI). A CFA for section 2 (response of significant other) resulted in acceptable GFI after 2 items were deleted. Decrease in activity levels (section 3) because of other consequences of injury was significantly greater after tetraplegia than after paraplegia. In contrast, pain-related reduction in activities was not associated with injury level. Although other consequences of SCI may have greater impact on activities than pain, severe pain is likely to affect activity levels significantly. CONCLUSION: The MPI appears to be appropriate for use in a SCI population when modified to eliminate questions related to work and to supplement the activity scale with items addressing decreased activity levels due to pain. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors: Jennifer Maria Nelli; Keith Nicholson; S Fatima Lakha; Ada F Louffat; Luis Chapparo; Julio C Furlan; Julio Furlan; Angela Mailis-Gagnon Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.037
Authors: Thomas N Bryce; Cecilia Norrbrink Budh; Diana D Cardenas; Marcel Dijkers; Elizabeth R Felix; Nanna B Finnerup; Paul Kennedy; Thomas Lundeberg; J Scott Richards; Diana H Rintala; Philip Siddall; Eva Widerstrom-Noga Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2007 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Max O Krucoff; Robert Gramer; Dana Lott; Emily Kale; Amol P Yadav; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr; Saurabh R Sinha; Shivanand P Lad Journal: Spinal Cord Ser Cases Date: 2020-10-16
Authors: Mary P Galea; Sarah A Dunlop; Glen M Davis; Andrew Nunn; Timothy Geraghty; Ya-seng Arthur Hsueh; Leonid Churilov Journal: Trials Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 2.279