Literature DB >> 11887020

A comparative study between INR and the determination of prothrombin time with the Coaguchek(r) portable coagulometer in the dental treatment of anticoagulated patients.

A Plaza-Costa1, P Garcia-Romero, R Poveda-Roda, J V Bagan, F J Silvestre-Donat, J A Cervero.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of the Coaguchek(r) portable coagulometer for determining the International Normalized Ratio (INR) in dental practice. STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 139 INR determinations were made in 88 patients anticoagulated with acenocoumarol (Sintrom(r)) for thrombotic pathology, based on the habitual laboratory procedure (Sample 1). Posteriorly and prior to dental treatment, INR was again determined using the Coaguchek(r) portable device (Sample 2). Both determinations were subsequently compared to evaluate possible significant differences between them, applying the Student t-test for paired data and regression measures.
RESULTS: The mean INR in Sample 1 was not significantly different to that recorded with the Coaguchek(r) portable device (Sample 2) (2,31 0,81 versus 2,28 0,82, respectively, t= 0,98; p= 0,32). A statistically significant relation was observed between the two samples (R= 0,92; p< 0,01).
CONCLUSIONS: The Coaguchek(r) portable coagulometer is a valid instrument for determining INR in anticoagulated individuals, and constitutes an effective method in application to the outpatient dental treatment of such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11887020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oral        ISSN: 1137-2834


  1 in total

1.  Security and cost comparison of INR self-testing and conventional hospital INR testing in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement.

Authors:  Qiu-lin Chen; Li Dong; Yi-jun Dong; Shu-lin Zhao; Bo Fu; Yu-qing Wang; Hong Jiang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.637

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.