Literature DB >> 11885605

Direct comparison of the impact of head tracking, reverberation, and individualized head-related transfer functions on the spatial perception of a virtual speech source.

D R Begault1, E M Wenzel, M R Anderson.   

Abstract

A study of sound localization performance was conducted using headphone-delivered virtual speech stimuli, rendered via HRTF-based acoustic auralization software and hardware, and blocked-meatus HRTF measurements. The independent variables were chosen to evaluate commonly held assumptions in the literature regarding improved localization: inclusion of head tracking, individualized HRTFs, and early and diffuse reflections. Significant effects were found for azimuth and elevation error, reversal rates, and externalization.

Keywords:  NASA Center ARC; NASA Discipline Space Human Factors

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11885605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Audio Eng Soc            Impact factor:   0.833


  20 in total

1.  Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-03

2.  Spectral equalization in binaural signals represented by order-truncated spherical harmonics.

Authors:  Zamir Ben-Hur; Fabian Brinkmann; Jonathan Sheaffer; Stefan Weinzierl; Boaz Rafaely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  3-D localization of virtual sound sources: effects of visual environment, pointing method, and training.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Fast multipole boundary element method to calculate head-related transfer functions for a wide frequency range.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kreuzer; Piotr Majdak; Zhengsheng Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.

Authors:  Suzanne Carr Levy; Daniel J Freed; Michael Nilsson; Brian C J Moore; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The contribution of head movement to the externalization and internalization of sounds.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Alan W Boyd; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perceptual factors contribute more than acoustical factors to sound localization abilities with virtual sources.

Authors:  Guillaume Andéol; Sophie Savel; Anne Guillaume
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Simultaneous Assessment of Speech Identification and Spatial Discrimination: A Potential Testing Approach for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users?

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Naomi Elliott; Katherine C Wood; Deborah A Vickers
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Spatial Hearing with Incongruent Visual or Auditory Room Cues.

Authors:  Juan C Gil-Carvajal; Jens Cubick; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  An Auditory Illusion of Proximity of the Source Induced by Sonic Crystals.

Authors:  Ignacio Spiousas; Pablo E Etchemendy; Ramiro O Vergara; Esteban R Calcagno; Manuel C Eguia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.