Literature DB >> 11885502

Differentiation of malignant vertebral collapse from osteoporotic and other benign causes using magnetic resonance imaging.

D Y L Tan1, I Y Y Tsou, T S G Chee.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients presenting with backache and vertebral collapse are a diagnostic challenge. Plain X-rays, computed tomography and radionuclide bone scans have not always reliably distinguished between benign and malignant causes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be able to do so.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent MRI evaluation for vertebral collapse were retrospectively studied. Over a 21-month period from January 1995 to September 1996, 47 patients with 58 vertebral collapses were studied. Benign and malignant aetiologies were established by serial imaging, clinical outcome and histology. Imaging was performed with T1 and T2-weighted sequences, with contrast enhancement in some patients. Collapsed vertebrae were examined for appearance of marrow on T1 and T2-weighted sequences and after contrast administration, signal intensity of adjacent discs, degree of marrow involvement, involvement of posterior elements, presence or absence of paraspinal mass and end-plate integrity. Agreement between the final and radiological diagnosis was evaluated.
RESULTS: There were 36 benign vertebral collapses (20 osteoporotic, 7 post-traumatic, 9 infective) and 22 malignant ones (20 metastatic carcinoma, 2 multiple myeloma). Features which pointed to malignant cause were hypointense marrow on T1-weighted images, marrow enhancement after intravenous contrast, greater than 50% marrow involvement and involvement of posterior elements. Of the vertebral collapses due to infection, 78% showed end-plate disruption.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that MRI can be used to accurately differentiate between benign and malignant causes of vertebral collapse. Further differentiation between an osteoporotic, traumatic or infective cause can be done with the help of clinical history and evaluation of end-plate integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11885502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore        ISSN: 0304-4602            Impact factor:   2.473


  6 in total

1.  Causes of late revision surgery after bone cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Kee-Yong Ha; Young-Hoon Kim; Dong-Gunn Chang; Il-Nam Son; Ki-Won Kim; Sung-Eun Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-11-28

2.  Does the META score evaluating osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral fractures have enough agreement to be used by orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of training?

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Pablo Besa; Sergio Morales; Antonio Parlange; Sebastian Flores; Mauricio Campos; Sebastian Mobarec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Delayed Recognition of Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebral Compression Fractures in Minor Accident Cases.

Authors:  Jesse Hatgis; Michelle Granville; Robert E Jacobson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-02-23

4.  Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Treatment-Related Decision Making for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Cong Jin; Guojian Xu; Dong Weng; Minghua Xie; Yu Qian
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-01-03

5.  Discriminating imaging findings of acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Khalid Mohammad Qasem; Akinobu Suzuki; Kentaro Yamada; Masatoshi Hoshino; Tadao Tsujio; Shinji Takahashi; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Discrimination between Malignant and Benign Vertebral Fractures Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Takigawa; Masato Tanaka; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Tomoko Tetsunaga; Keiichiro Nishida; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.