Literature DB >> 11884845

Scar assessment tools: implications for current research.

Paul P M van Zuijlen1, Adam P Angeles, Robert W Kreis, Kurt E Bos, Esther Middelkoop.   

Abstract

Scarring is considered a major medical problem that leads to cosmetic and functional sequelae. Scar tissue is clinically distinguished from normal skin by an aberrant color, rough surface texture, increased thickness (hypertrophy), occurrence of contraction, and firmness. Marked histologic differences are the change in dermal architecture and the presence of cells such as the myofibroblast. Many assessment tools are available for analysis of pathologic conditions of the skin; however, there is no general agreement as to the most appropriate tools for evaluation of scar tissue. This review critically discusses currently available objective measurement tools, subjective assessment tools, and potential devices that may be available in the future for scar assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11884845     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200203000-00052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  20 in total

1.  Letter to the editor.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2007-09-30

2.  An intra-individual surgical wound comparison shows that octenidine-based hydrogel wound dressing ameliorates scar appearance following abdominoplasty.

Authors:  Johannes Matiasek; Philip Kienzl; Lukas W Unger; Christoph Grill; Rupert Koller; Bela R Turk
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Improved microcirculation imaging of human skin in vivo using optical microangiography with a correlation mapping mask.

Authors:  Woo June Choi; Roberto Reif; Siavash Yousefi; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Differential item functioning in the Observer Scale of the POSAS for different scar types.

Authors:  Martijn B A van der Wal; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson; Esther Middelkoop; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers.

Authors:  Callie M Thompson; Ravi F Sood; Shari Honari; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  The use of dermal substitutes in burn surgery: acute phase.

Authors:  Shahriar Shahrokhi; Anna Arno; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Scar Revision Surgery: The Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Benjamin H Miranda; Anna Y Allan; Daniel P Butler; Paul D Cussons
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-11-16

8.  Cutaneous scarring: a clinical review.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Fulvio Urso-Baiarda; Claire Linge; Adriaan Grobbelaar
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2010-02-10

9.  Treatment of third-degree burn wounds in animal specimens: acellular dermis or partial-thickness skin graft.

Authors:  M J Fatemi; M Momeni; A Tavakoli; T Bagheri; A Hosseini; S Araghi; F Ranjpoor; A Zavareh
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-06-30

10.  The use of matriderm and autologous skin graft in the treatment of full thickness skin defects.

Authors:  Jang Hwan Min; In Sik Yun; Dae Hyun Lew; Tai Suk Roh; Won Jai Lee
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.