OBJECTIVES: Two multicenter studies were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SonoVue as a contrast agent for enhanced left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LVEBD), and to compare the efficacy of SonoVue and Albunex in adult patients with a suboptimal, nonenhanced echocardiogram. BACKGROUND: The use of contrast to enhance echocardiographic assessment of LVEBD is well-established. SonoVue is a new microbubble contrast agent that contains sulfur hexafluoride. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive four injections of SonoVue (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 ml), or two injections of Albunex and two injections of hand-agitated saline (0.08 and 0.22 ml/kg). Echocardiographic images were evaluated at the study centers and by four blinded, offsite reviewers for degree of left ventricle opacification (LVO), duration of contrast enhancement, and LVEBD. RESULTS:LVO scores were significantly higher for all doses of SonoVue. Patients with complete LVO ranged from 34%-87% for SonoVue and from 0%-16% for Albunex. The mean duration of useful contrast effect ranged from 0.8-4.1 minutes for SonoVue and < 15 seconds for Albunex. Mean increases in LVEBD scores ranged from 3.8-18.2 for SonoVue and 0.1-4.3 for Albunex. SonoVue (cumulative 7.5 ml dose) was well-tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that observed in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: SonoVue is superior to Albunex for improving visualization of endocardial borders in patients with suboptimal noncontrast echocardiograms. Optimal increases in LVEBD, LVO, and duration of useful contrast effect were observed at the 2.0 ml dose of SonoVue.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Two multicenter studies were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SonoVue as a contrast agent for enhanced left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LVEBD), and to compare the efficacy of SonoVue and Albunex in adult patients with a suboptimal, nonenhanced echocardiogram. BACKGROUND: The use of contrast to enhance echocardiographic assessment of LVEBD is well-established. SonoVue is a new microbubble contrast agent that contains sulfur hexafluoride. METHODS:Patients were randomized to receive four injections of SonoVue (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 ml), or two injections of Albunex and two injections of hand-agitated saline (0.08 and 0.22 ml/kg). Echocardiographic images were evaluated at the study centers and by four blinded, offsite reviewers for degree of left ventricle opacification (LVO), duration of contrast enhancement, and LVEBD. RESULTS: LVO scores were significantly higher for all doses of SonoVue. Patients with complete LVO ranged from 34%-87% for SonoVue and from 0%-16% for Albunex. The mean duration of useful contrast effect ranged from 0.8-4.1 minutes for SonoVue and < 15 seconds for Albunex. Mean increases in LVEBD scores ranged from 3.8-18.2 for SonoVue and 0.1-4.3 for Albunex. SonoVue (cumulative 7.5 ml dose) was well-tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that observed in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: SonoVue is superior to Albunex for improving visualization of endocardial borders in patients with suboptimal noncontrast echocardiograms. Optimal increases in LVEBD, LVO, and duration of useful contrast effect were observed at the 2.0 ml dose of SonoVue.
Authors: Xiaoxiao Zhang; Li Yuan; Linli Qiu; Yali Yang; Qing Lv; Lin Li; Jing Wang; Lin He; Li Zhang; Xinfang Wang; Mingxing Xie; Xu Yu Jin Journal: Front Med Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 4.592
Authors: M Beth McCarville; Sue C Kaste; Fredric A Hoffer; Raja B Khan; R Christopher Walton; Bruce S Alpert; Wayne L Furman; Chenghong Li; Xiaoping Xiong Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2012-01-17