Literature DB >> 11883914

Stimulus satiation: effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake.

M M Hetherington1, L M Pirie, S Nabb.   

Abstract

Frequent and repeated exposure to foods produces stimulus satiation or monotony. To explore further the nature of stimulus satiation, two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 investigated the influence of initial pleasantness and frequency of intake on monotony. Tests showed that bread and butter was eaten more frequently but was liked less than chocolate. Therefore, normal-weight, healthy males were randomly assigned to either a chocolate condition (CC, N=13) or bread and butter condition (BC, N=16). All subjects received fixed amounts of the assigned food (67g/1473kJ of chocolate or 95g/1355kJ of bread and butter) every day for 22 days. On days 1, 8, 15 and 22 subjects consumed this food ad libitum. Pleasantness of taste and desire to eat chocolate declined significantly over time but no such changes were observed for bread and butter. Experiment 2 examined intake, pleasantness and desire to eat chocolate in 53 subjects over a 15 day period, with 3 conditions: control (CS: N=15), fixed (FS: N=20) and variable (VS: N=18). CS received no chocolate except on test days (days 1, 8 and 15), FS received 67g/1473kJ of chocolate daily and VS received increasing amounts of chocolate from 57g/1251kJ on day 1 to 86g/1888kJ by day 12. Pleasantness and desire to eat chocolate declined over time with this being more pronounced for F and V subjects. However, ad libitum intake increased over time. Both experiments demonstrated significant changes in pleasantness and desire to eat chocolate, but no commensurate decline in intake. Thus, although stimulus satiation occurred for subjective ratings of pleasantness and desire to eat chocolate, intake remained unaffected. This apparent dissociation between pleasantness and intake may reflect different processes underlying liking and wanting. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11883914     DOI: 10.1006/appe.2001.0442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  23 in total

1.  Food choice and diet variety in weight-restored patients with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Janet E Schebendach; Laurel E Mayer; Michael J Devlin; Evelyn Attia; Isobel R Contento; Randi L Wolf; B Timothy Walsh
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-05

2.  Perceptual and neural response to affective tactile texture stimulation in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Carissa J Cascio; Estephan J Moana-Filho; Steve Guest; Mary Beth Nebel; Jonathan Weisner; Grace T Baranek; Gregory K Essick
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 5.216

3.  Gain in Body Fat Is Associated with Increased Striatal Response to Palatable Food Cues, whereas Body Fat Stability Is Associated with Decreased Striatal Response.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Neural vulnerability factors for obesity.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Kyle Burger
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-12-19

5.  Meta-analytic clustering dissociates brain activity and behavior profiles across reward processing paradigms.

Authors:  Jessica S Flannery; Michael C Riedel; Katherine L Bottenhorn; Ranjita Poudel; Taylor Salo; Lauren D Hill-Bowen; Angela R Laird; Matthew T Sutherland
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Nut-enriched bread is an effective and acceptable vehicle to improve regular nut consumption.

Authors:  Asika Devi; Alexandra Chisholm; Andrew Gray; Siew Ling Tey; Destynee Williamson-Poutama; Sonya L Cameron; Rachel C Brown
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 7.  Factors that influence the reinforcing value of foods and beverages.

Authors:  Jennifer L Temple
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-01

Review 8.  Neural vulnerability factors that increase risk for future weight gain.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 9.  Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Temple; Alison M Bulkley; Rebecca L Badawy; Nicole Krause; Sarah McCann; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.