Literature DB >> 11883838

Predictors of outcome in surgically managed patients with typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of results following microvascular decompression.

Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara1, Amin B Kassam, Michael H Horowitz, Louise Urgo, Constantinos Hadjipanayis, Elad I Levy, Yue-Fang Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Microvascular decompression (MVD) has become one of the primary treatments for typical trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Not all patients with facial pain, however, suffer from the typical form of this disease; many patients who present for surgical intervention actually have atypical TN. The authors compare the results of MVD performed for typical and atypical TN at their institution.
METHODS: The results of 2675 MVDs in 2264 patients were reviewed using information obtained from the department database. The authors examined immediate postoperative relief in 2003 patients with typical and 672 with atypical TN, and long-term follow-up results in patients for whom more than 5 years of follow-up data were available (969 with typical and 219 with atypical TN). Outcomes were divided into three categories: excellent, pain relief without medication; good, mild or intermittent pain controlled with low-dose medication; and poor, no or poor pain relief with large amounts of medication. The results for typical and atypical TN were compared and patient history and pain characteristics were evaluated for possible predictive factors.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, MVD for typical TN resulted in complete postoperative pain relief in 80% of patients, compared with 47% with complete relief in those with atypical TN. Significant pain relief was achieved after 97% of MVDs in patients with typical TN and after 87% of these procedures for atypical TN. When patients were followed for more than 5 years, the long-term pain relief after MVD for those with typical TN was excellent in 73% and good in an additional 7%, for an overall significant pain relief in 80% of patients. In contrast, following MVD for atypical TN, the long-term results were excellent in only 35% of cases and good in an additional 16%, for overall significant pain relief in only 51%. Memorable onset and trigger points were predictive of better postoperative pain relief in both atypical and typical TN. Preoperative sensory loss was a negative predictor for good long-term results following MVD for atypical TN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11883838     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.3.0527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  30 in total

1.  Altered somatosensory processing in trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Maria Blatow; Ernst Nennig; Elise Sarpaczki; Julia Reinhardt; Martin Schlieter; Christian Herweh; Dirk Rasche; Volker M Tronnier; Klaus Sartor; Christoph Stippich
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Advanced age as a contraindication to microvascular decompression for drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia: evidence of prejudice?

Authors:  Paolo Ferroli; Francesco Acerbi; Massimo Tomei; Giovanni Tringali; Angelo Franzini; Giovanni Broggi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of trigeminal ganglion for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression (MVD).

Authors:  Y Du; D Yang; X Dong; Q Du; H Wang; W Yu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Pain Outcomes Following Microvascular Decompression for Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Holste; Alvin Y Chan; John D Rolston; Dario J Englot
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Predictive nomogram for the durability of pain relief from gamma knife radiation surgery in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  John T Lucas; Adrian M Nida; Scott Isom; Kopriva Marshall; John D Bourland; Adrian W Laxton; Stephen B Tatter; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Surgical management of medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Bruce E Pollock
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 7.  Chronic orofacial pain.

Authors:  Rafael Benoliel; Yair Sharav
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2010-02

Review 8.  Comparative evaluation of surgical procedures for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Monika Parmar; Neha Sharma; Vikas Modgill; Purushotham Naidu
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-11-29

Review 9.  [Patient careers. Facial pain and neuralgias].

Authors:  C Sommer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes of Microvascular Decompression for Mixed Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Adela Wu; Tina Doshi; Alice Hung; Tomas Garzon-Muvdi; Matthew T Bender; Chetan Bettegowda; Michael Lim
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.