Literature DB >> 11882813

The Ross procedure is the procedure of choice for congenital aortic valve disease.

Zohair Al-Halees1, Frans Pieters, Fatima Qadoura, Maie Shahid, Mohammed Al-Amri, Fadel Al-Fadley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Ross procedure has emerged as an attractive option for aortic valve replacement in children and young adults. Our objective was to review our experience with the Ross procedure in young patients with congenital aortic valve disease. We also sought for evidence of growth in the autograft.
METHODS: From January 1990 to July 2000, 260 patients underwent the Ross procedure for various aortic valve diseases. There were 136 patients less than 18 years of age. Fifty-three (38%) of these patients had congenital aortic valve disease. Ages ranged from 3 months to 18 years (mean, 8 plus minus 5 years; median, 9 years). Ten patients were less than 2 years of age. Pure aortic stenosis was present in 18 patients, mixed stenosis and regurgitation in 32, and pure aortic regurgitation in 3. The aortic valve was bicuspid in 29 patients. Twenty-nine patients had previous procedures, mostly balloon dilation of the aortic valve (n = 8) or surgical aortic valvotomy (n = 12).
RESULTS: In all patients immediate results demonstrated a normally functioning neoaortic valve with not more than trivial aortic valve regurgitation. In the patients with stenosis, all levels of obstruction were relieved, and the gradient across the left ventricular outflow tract was completely abolished. Hospital mortality was 3 (5.6%) of 53 (overall Ross mortality was 34 of 260 [1.5%]). The patients were followed up for a mean of 4 years and up to 10 years. One patient died late of a noncardiac cause. Actuarial survival at 10 years was 94% plus minus 2%, and freedom from all events was 93% plus minus 5%. Only 1 patient needed autograft replacement for endocarditis. Intervention related to right ventricle-pulmonary artery conduit was required in 3 patients: balloon dilatation in 2, and reoperation in 1. At last follow-up, all patients but one were classified as being in New York Heart Association functional class I or II with normal or near-normal autograft valve function. Serial measurement of the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic root showed that as patients grew, the size of the outflow tract increased. When indexed to body surface area, this increase correlated with the patients' expected somatic growth.
CONCLUSIONS: The Ross procedure for congenital aortic valve disease in children and young adults offers excellent hemodynamics, with the added advantage of real potential for growth. It should be considered the treatment of choice in this age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11882813     DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2002.119705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  14 in total

1.  The novel two-dimensional strain reflects improvement and remodeling of left-ventricular function better than conventional echocardiographic parameters after aortic valve repair in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yaping Mi; Tanja Rädle-Hurst; Axel Rentzsch; Diana Aicher; Hans Joachim Schäfers; Hashim Abdul-Khaliq
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Anesthetic management for severe aortic regurgitation in an infant repaired by Ross procedure.

Authors:  Akira Watabe; Hitoshi Saito; Katsumi Harasawa; Yuji Morimoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Aortic valve repair in children.

Authors:  Yves d'Udekem
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

4.  Mid-term results of open aortic valvotomy for infants with critical aortic stenosis: seven-year experience including delayed Ross strategy.

Authors:  Junichi Koizumi; Kozo Ishino; Masaaki Kawada; Ko Yoshizumi; Kazushige Kanki; Shunji Sano
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-11

5.  Dilatation and Dysfunction of the Neo-aortic Root and in 76 Patients After the Ross Procedure.

Authors:  Corina A Zimmermann; Roland Weber; Matthias Greutmann; Hitendu Dave; Christoph Müller; René Prêtre; Burkhardt Seifert; Emanuela Valsangiacomo Buechel; Oliver Kretschmar; Christine H Attenhofer Jost
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Outcomes of the infant Ross procedure for congenital aortic stenosis followed into adolescence.

Authors:  Robert W Elder; Jan M Quaegebeur; Emile A Bacha; Jonathan M Chen; Francois Bourlon; Ismee A Williams
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 7.  Stem cell therapy and tissue engineering for correction of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Elisa Avolio; Massimo Caputo; Paolo Madeddu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-06-30

8.  The Ross Procedure in Pediatric Patients: A 20-Year Experience of Ross Procedure in a Single Institution.

Authors:  Dong Woog Yoon; Ji-Hyuk Yang; Tae-Gook Jun; Pyo Won Park
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-05

9.  Ross procedure in children: 17-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Sharman P Tan Tanny; Matthew S Yong; Yves d'Udekem; Remi Kowalski; Gavin Wheaton; Luigi D'Orsogna; John C Galati; Christian P Brizard; Igor E Konstantinov
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Ross operation in children and young adults: the Alder Hey case series.

Authors:  Shahzad Gull Raja; Marco Pozzi
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.