Literature DB >> 11882462

Regulation of bone volume is different in the metaphyses of the femur and vertebra of C3H/HeJ and C57BL/6J mice.

M H-C Sheng1, D J Baylink, W G Beamer, L R Donahue, K-H W Lau, J E Wergedal.   

Abstract

The C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice exhibited a greater bone formation rate (BFR) and a greater mineral apposition rate (MAR) in the cortical bone of the midshafts of the femur and tibia than did C57BL/6J (B6) mice. This study sought to determine if these strain-related differences would also be observed in cancellous bone. Metaphyses of the femur and lumbar vertebra (L5-6) from C3H and B6 mice, 6 and 12 weeks of age, were analyzed by histomorphometry. Similar to cortical bone, the bone volume in the femoral metaphysis of C3H mice was greater (by 54% and 65%, respectively) than that of B6 mice at both 6 and 12 weeks of age. Higher BFR and mineral apposition rate (MAR) contributed to the higher bone volume in the C3H mice compared with the B6 mice. In contrast, bone volume (by 59% and 13%, respectively, p < 0.001) and trabecular number (by 55% and 35%, respectively, p < 0.001) in the vertebrae were lower in the C3H mice than in B6 mice at 6 and 12 weeks of age. At 6 weeks of age, MAR was higher (by 43%, p = 0.004) in C3H mice, but because of a low trabecular number, the BFR (by 37%, p = 0.026) and tetracycline-labeled bone surface (by 52%, p < 0.001) per tissue were lower in the vertebrae of C3H mice than B6 mice. The low bone volume in vertebrae of C3H mice was probably not due to a higher bone resorption, because the osteoclast number (by 55%, p < 0.001) and eroded surface (by 61%, p <0.001) per tissue area in the C3H mice were also lower in B6 mice. At 12 weeks, the trabecular thickness had increased (by 36%, p < 0.001) in the C3H mice and the difference in bone volume between strains was less than that at 6 weeks. These contrasting and apparently opposing strain-related differences in trabecular bone parameters between femur and vertebra in these two mouse strains suggest that the genetic regulation of bone volume in the metaphyses of different skeletal sites is different between C3H and B6 mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11882462     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00693-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  14 in total

1.  Quantitative trait loci for tibial bone strength in C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Feng Jiao; Hank Chiu; Yan Jiao; Waldemar G de Rijk; Xinmin Li; Eugene C Eckstein; Wesley G Beamer; Weikuan Gu
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 2.  Genetic epidemiology of osteoporosis: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Joseph M Zmuda; Yah-Tyng Sheu; Susan P Moffett
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Degradation of Bioresorbable Mg-4Zn-1Sr Intramedullary Pins and Associated Biological Responses in Vitro and in Vivo.

Authors:  Aaron F Cipriano; Jiajia Lin; Alan Lin; Amy Sallee; Belinda Le; Mayra Celene Cortez Alcaraz; Ren-Guo Guan; Gary Botimer; Serkan Inceoğlu; Huinan Liu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 9.229

4.  Dietary calcium intake and genetics have site-specific effects on peak trabecular bone mass and microarchitecture in male mice.

Authors:  Krittikan Chanpaisaeng; Perla C Reyes Fernandez; James C Fleet
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Strain differences in the attenuation of bone accrual in a young growing mouse model of insulin resistance.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rendina-Ruedy; Jennifer L Graef; McKale R Davis; Kelsey D Hembree; Jeffrey M Gimble; Stephen L Clarke; Edralin A Lucas; Brenda J Smith
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Central IL-1 receptor signaling regulates bone growth and mass.

Authors:  Alon Bajayo; Inbal Goshen; Sharon Feldman; Valer Csernus; Kerstin Iverfeldt; Esther Shohami; Raz Yirmiya; Itai Bab
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genetic variation in candidate osteoporosis genes, bone mineral density, and fracture risk: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Gregory J Tranah; Brent C Taylor; Li-Yung Lui; Joseph M Zmuda; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Teresa A Hillier; Marc C Hochberg; Jia Li; Brian K Rhees; Henry A Erlich; Mark D Sternlicht; Gary Peltz; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Osteoprotegerin Lys3Asn polymorphism and the risk of fracture in older women.

Authors:  S P Moffett; J I Oakley; J A Cauley; L Y Lui; K E Ensrud; B C Taylor; T A Hillier; M C Hochberg; J Li; S Cayabyab; J M Lee; G Peltz; S R Cummings; J M Zmuda
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Targeted transgenic expression of an osteoclastic transmembrane protein-tyrosine phosphatase in cells of osteoclastic lineage increases bone resorption and bone loss in male young adult mice.

Authors:  Matilda H-C Sheng; Mehran Amoui; Virginia Stiffel; Apurva K Srivastava; Jon E Wergedal; K-H William Lau
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Genetic analysis of vertebral trabecular bone density and cross-sectional area in older men.

Authors:  J M Zmuda; L M Yerges-Armstrong; S P Moffett; L Klei; C M Kammerer; K Roeder; J A Cauley; A Kuipers; K E Ensrud; C S Nestlerode; A R Hoffman; C E Lewis; T F Lang; E Barrett-Connor; R E Ferrell; E S Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.