Literature DB >> 11882096

Reorganizing the delivery of intensive care could improve efficiency and save lives.

Adrienne G Randolph1, Peter Pronovost.   

Abstract

Critically ill patients are at high risk for death and permanent disability. Their care is also very expensive. The method of delivering critical care services to these patients can have an impact on their clinical and economic outcomes. Researchers face significant challenges when attempting to identify an association between an intensive care unit (ICU) organizational characteristic and patient outcomes. In this paper we review the challenges faced when evaluating the impact of ICU organizational characteristics on patient outcomes and highlight ICU characteristics that are consistently associated with improved patient outcomes. These characteristics include: (i) the presence of specialist physicians devoted to the ICU; (ii) increased nurse : patient ratios; (iii) decreased use of tests and evaluations that will not change clinical management; (iv) development and implementation of evidence-based protocols and guidelines; (v) use of computer-based alerting and reminding systems; and (vi) having a pharmacist participate in daily rounds in the ICU. When implementing these in ICUs, it is important to evaluate the impact of these characteristics on patient outcomes. We provide a format for such an evaluation. Given the growing evidence supporting the association between specific ICU characteristics and improved patient outcomes, we hope the future realizes broad implementation of these beneficial characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11882096     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2002.00321.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  11 in total

1.  How critical are critical care pharmacists?

Authors:  Clarence Chant
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-01

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Clarence Chant
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-01

3.  It makes a difference!

Authors:  Stephan Jakob
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  The use of wireless e-mail to improve healthcare team communication.

Authors:  Chris O'Connor; Jan O Friedrich; Damon C Scales; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Bedside Computer Clinical Decision Support Protocol for Hyperglycemia Is Feasible, Safe and Offers Advantages.

Authors:  Eliotte L Hirshberg; Michael J Lanspa; Emily L Wilson; Katherine A Sward; Al Jephson; Gitte Y Larsen; Alan H Morris
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Medication regimen complexity vs patient acuity for predicting critical care pharmacist interventions.

Authors:  Susan E Smith; Rachel Shelley; Andrea Sikora
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Socioeconomic disparities in mortality after cancer surgery: failure to rescue.

Authors:  Bradley N Reames; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick; Amir A Ghaferi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  The way in which a physiotherapy service is structured can improve patient outcome from a surgical intensive care: a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Susan D Hanekom; Quinette Louw; Andre Coetzee
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Quality care in pediatric trauma.

Authors:  Amelia J Simpson; Frederick P Rivara; Tam N Pham
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2012-09

10.  Perceived barriers to the regionalization of adult critical care in the United States: a qualitative preliminary study.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Rebecca J Asch; Theodore J Iwashyna; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; David A Asch
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.