Literature DB >> 11881919

The effect of birth weight and feeding of supplemental milk replacer to piglets during lactation on preweaning and postweaning growth performance and carcass characteristics.

B F Wolter1, M Ellis, B P Corrigan, J M DeDecker.   

Abstract

The effects of piglet birth weight and liquid milk replacer supplementation of piglets during lactation on growth performance to slaughter weight was evaluated in a study carried out with 32 sows (PIC C-22) and their piglets (n = 384; progeny of PIC Line 337 sires). A randomized block design with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was used. Treatments were birth weight (Heavy vs Light) and liquid milk replacer (Supplemented vs Unsupplemented). The study was divided into two periods. At the start of period 1 (birth to weaning), pigs were assigned to either Heavy or Light (1.8 [SD = 0.09] vs 1.3 kg [SD = 0.07] BW, respectively, P < 0.001) litters of 12 pigs and half of the litters were given ad libitum access to supplemental milk replacer from d 3 of lactation to weaning (21 +/- 0.2 d). In period 2 (weaning to 110 kg BW), a total of 308 pigs were randomly selected from within previous treatment and sex subclasses and placed in pens of four pigs. Pigs were given ad libitum access to diets that met or exceeded nutrient requirements. Pigs in heavy litters were heavier at weaning (6.6 vs 5.7 kg BW; SE = 0.14; P < 0.001) and tended to have more pigs weaned (11.4 vs 10.9 pigs/litter; SE = 0.21; P = 0.10). After weaning, pigs in the Heavy litter had greater ADG (851 vs 796 g; SE = 6.7; P < 0.001) and ADFI (1,866 vs 1,783 g; SE = 17.6; P < 0.001), similar gain:feed (0.46 vs 0.45; SE = 0.003; P > 0.05), and required seven fewer days (P < 0.001) to reach slaughter weight compared to pigs in the Light treatment. Feeding supplemental milk replacer during lactation produced heavier pigs at weaning (6.6 vs 5.7 kg BW; SE = 0.14; P < 0.001) and tended to increase the number of pigs weaned (11.4 vs 10.9 pigs/litter; SE = 0.21; P = 0.10) but had no effect (P > 0.05) on growth performance from weaning to slaughter. However, pigs fed milk replacer required three fewer days (P < 0.01) to reach 110 kg BW. Sow feed intake and BW loss during lactation were not affected (P > 0.05) by either birth weight or milk replacer treatment. In conclusion, birth weight has a substantially greater impact on pig growth performance after weaning than increasing nutrient intake during lactation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11881919     DOI: 10.2527/2002.802301x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  17 in total

1.  Pig characteristics associated with mortality and light exit weight for the nursery phase.

Authors:  A J Larriestra; S Wattanaphansak; E J Neumann; J Bradford; R B Morrison; J Deen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets.

Authors:  Nuria Canibe; Ole Højberg; Hanne Kongsted; Darya Vodolazska; Charlotte Lauridsen; Tina Skau Nielsen; Anna A Schönherz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Review: Physiology and nutrition of late gestating and transition sows.

Authors:  Peter Kappel Theil; Chantal Farmer; Takele Feyera
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

4.  Gilt development to improve offspring performance and survivability.

Authors:  Jamil E G Faccin; Mike D Tokach; Robert D Goodband; Joel M DeRouchey; Jason C Woodworth; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study.

Authors:  J Pustal; I Traulsen; R Preißler; K Müller; T Große Beilage; U Börries; N Kemper
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2015-10-09

6.  Does intrauterine crowding affect locomotor development? A comparative study of motor performance, neuromotor maturation and gait variability among piglets that differ in birth weight and vitality.

Authors:  Charlotte Vanden Hole; Peter Aerts; Sara Prims; Miriam Ayuso; Steven Van Cruchten; Chris Van Ginneken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cross-Fostering Implications for Pig Mortality, Welfare and Performance.

Authors:  Julia A Calderón Díaz; Edgar García Manzanilla; Alessia Diana; Laura A Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-06

Review 8.  Amino acids and mammary gland development: nutritional implications for milk production and neonatal growth.

Authors:  Reza Rezaei; Zhenlong Wu; Yongqing Hou; Fuller W Bazer; Guoyao Wu
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-04-02

9.  Post-weaning and whole-of-life performance of pigs is determined by live weight at weaning and the complexity of the diet fed after weaning.

Authors:  Cherie L Collins; John R Pluske; Rebecca S Morrison; Trevor N McDonald; Robert J Smits; David J Henman; Ingunn Stensland; Frank R Dunshea
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2017-01-06

10.  On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Suckling Piglets: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marika Vitali; Elena Santacroce; Federico Correa; Chiara Salvarani; Francesca Paola Maramotti; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Trevisi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.