Literature DB >> 11881725

Treatment decision-making and its relation to the sense of coherence and the meaning of the disease in a group of patients with colorectal cancer.

E Ramfelt1, A Langius, H Björvell, G Nordström.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aims of the present study were to describe the preferred and the actual participating roles in treatment decision-making in relation to patients with newly diagnosed, colorectal cancer and to relate this result to the sociodemographic data, the Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC) and the patients' meaning of the disease. Eighty-six patients were studied. The following instruments were used: the Control Preferences Scale (CPS); the eight Lipowski categories of the meaning of the disease (LCMD); and the SOC. The results showed that 62% of the patients preferred a collaborative role and 28% a passive role in treatment decision-making. Agreement between the preferred and the actual participating roles was achieved by 44% of the patients. Seventy-one per cent of the patients showed an optimistic understanding of their disease. The mean SOC score was 150. There was no statistically significant difference between the CPS groups as regarded the sociodemographic data, the SOC and the LCMD.
CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic data, the perceived meaning of the disease as well as the patients' sense of coherence were not related to the decision-making preferences in the investigated group of patients. Therefore, further investigations are needed to get an understanding of influencing factors of the decision-making preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11881725     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2000.00217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  3 in total

1.  The Integration of Emotional, Physiologic, and Communication Responses to Medical Oncology Surveillance Appointments During Breast Cancer Survivorship.

Authors:  Margaret F Clayton; Catherine Dingley; Gary Donaldson
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Too complex and time-consuming to fit in! Physicians' experiences of elderly patients and their participation in medical decision making: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Anne Wissendorff Ekdahl; Ingrid Hellström; Lars Andersson; Maria Friedrichsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Congruence between patients' preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Linda Brom; Wendy Hopmans; H Roeline W Pasman; Danielle R M Timmermans; Guy A M Widdershoven; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.796

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.