Literature DB >> 11880781

Screw pullout strength: a biomechanical comparison of large-fragment and small-fragment fixation in the tibial plateau.

Greg L Westmoreland1, Toni M McLaurin, William C Hutton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the pullout strengths of 6.5-millimeter diameter partially threaded cancellous screws and 4.5-millimeter diameter fully-threaded cortical screws versus 3.5-millimeter diameter cortical screws in the proximal tibia.
DESIGN: Three screws were inserted in the lateral tibial plateau of each leg of fifteen paired cadaveric tibias. In one tibia, large-fragment fixation was used, consisting of a unicortical 6.5-millimeter screw in the subchondral bone, and bicortical 4.5-millimeter screws in the metadiaphyseal and diaphyseal bone. In the contralateral tibia, small-fragment fixation consisting of three 3.5-millimeter screws was used, placing the screws in the same positions as described above. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: A materials-testing machine was used to determine axial pullout strengths of each screw. The mean pullout strengths of large-fragment and small-fragment screws in each position were compared.
RESULTS: No significant difference in pullout strengths was found between the large-fragment and small-fragment screws in subchondral and metadiaphyseal bone. A statistically significant difference was found between pullout strengths of large-fragment and small-fragment screws in diaphyseal bone.
CONCLUSIONS: In human proximal tibial bone, the data from this study do not suggest that the pullout strength of 3.5-millimeter screws differs from that of 6.5-millimeter screws in subchondral bone, or that the pullout strength of 3.5-millimeter screws differs from that of 4.5-millimeter screws in metadiaphyseal bone. However, the pullout strength of 3.5-millimeter screws is significantly less than that of 4.5-millimeter screws in diaphyseal bone. The authors of the present study believe this supports the use of small-fragment fixation in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11880781     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200203000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  10 in total

1.  New implant designs for fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  J Goldhahn; J Seebeck; R Frei; B Frenz; I Antoniadis; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Hoffa fracture: fixation using headless compression screws.

Authors:  V Borse; J Hahnel; A Cohen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Bicondylar tibial fractures: Internal or external fixation?

Authors:  Gunasekaran Kumar; Nicholas Peterson; Badri Narayan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of interfragmentary compression at tibia plateau fractures in vitro using different fixation techniques: a CONSORT-compliant article.

Authors:  K Kojima; B Gueorguiev; G Seva; K Stoffel; R Garcia de Oliveira; U Eberli; T Nicolino; M Lenz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Subchondral raft construction with locking plates for the treatment of Schatzker type II fractures.

Authors:  Cemil Kayali; Caner Citak; Taskin Altay; Zafer Kement
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

6.  Locking Plate Alone or in Combination with Cannulated Screws for Hoffa Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Zhenyue Chen; Xiaotan Wang; Jingyin Li; Lizhong Jing; Zehui Li; Xuewei Cao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  A case report of the Hoffa fracture and a review of literature.

Authors:  Muzaffar Mushtaq; Shabir Ahmed Dhar; Tariq Ahmed Bhat; Tahir Ahmed Dar
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2022-01-19

8.  Augmentation of tibial plateau fractures with Trabecular Metal: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Benoit Benoit; Zhim Fouad; George-Henri Laflamme; Dominique Rouleau; G Yves Laflamme
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  A biomechanical comparison between locked 3.5-mm plates and 4.5-mm plates for the treatment of simple bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: is bigger necessarily better?

Authors:  Saqib Hasan; Omri B Ayalon; Richard S Yoon; Amit Sood; Ulises Militano; Mark Cavanaugh; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-26

10.  Surgical Management of Tibial Plateau Fractures With 3.5 mm Simple Plates.

Authors:  Abolfazl Bagherifard; Mahmoud Jabalameli; Hosseinali Hadi; Mohammad Rahbar; Mohammadreza Minator Sajjadi; Ali Jahansouz; Hossein Karimi Heris
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2016-05-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.