Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip--a systematic review.

Displaced intracapsular hip fractures are often treated by hemiarthroplasty, with or without cement. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the literature to establish whether this influences the outcome. A comprehensive search of the English language world literature of all studies comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty was performed. Eighteen publications addressing this issue were identified. Three were excluded from review because of poor study design and non-comparability of groups. Of the remainder, few were suitable for statistical analysis, therefore a qualitative comparison of results was carried out. The majority of studies suggested a lower revision rate, less thigh pain and better mobility in-patients in whom the prosthesis was cemented. Cemented hemiarthroplasty may be associated with increased operative time and blood loss. There appears to be no difference in general complication, or mortality rates after 3 months, between the two groups. Radiographic differences were variable and did not correlate with clinical findings. We conclude, the literature tends to support the use of cement in hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Further prospective randomised studies are required to resolve the issue.