BACKGROUND: Alkylator resistance contributes to treatment failure in high-risk neuroblastoma. Buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) can deplete glutathione and synergistically enhance in vitro sensitivity to the alkylating agent melphalan (L-PAM) for many neuroblastoma cell lines, but optimal use of this combination needs to be defined because clinical responses have been less frequent and not durable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors established and characterized a neuroblastoma cell line (CHLA-171) from a patient who died of progressive disease after treatment with BSO and low-dose L-PAM. RESULTS: CHLA-171 lacks MYCN amplification, expresses PGP (P-glycoprotein) 9.5 RNA, and shows cell surface antigen expression (human leukocyte antigen class I weakly positive, but HSAN 1.2 (hybridoma, SAN 1.2) and anti-GD2 (anti-ganglioside GD2 antibody) strongly positive) characteristic of neuroblastoma cell lines. Twenty-four hours of BSO treatment (0-1,000 micromol/L) maximally depleted CHLA-171 glutathione to 36% of baseline. The cytotoxic response of CHLA-171 to BSO and L-PAM, alone and in combination, was measured by digital image microscopy (DIMSCAN) over a range of drug concentrations and compared with drug levels obtained in the patient during BSO/L-PAM therapy. As single agents, CHLA-171 was highly resistant to L-PAM (LD90 = 42 micromol/L; peak plasma concentration in the patient equals 3.9 micromol/L) and moderately resistant to BSO (LD90 = 509 micromol/L; steady-state concentration in the patient equals 397 micromol/L). Treatment with a 10:1 (BSO:L-PAM) fixed ratio combination synergistically overcame resistance (3-4 logs of cell kill, combination index <1) at clinically achievable levels of BSO (100-400 micromol/L) and levels of L-PAM (10-40 micromol/L) clinically achievable only with hematopoietic stem cell support. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro results obtained for CHLA-171 suggest that BSO/L-PAM therapy may be optimally effective for drug-resistant neuroblastoma using myeloablative doses of L-PAM.
BACKGROUND: Alkylator resistance contributes to treatment failure in high-risk neuroblastoma. Buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) can deplete glutathione and synergistically enhance in vitro sensitivity to the alkylating agent melphalan (L-PAM) for many neuroblastoma cell lines, but optimal use of this combination needs to be defined because clinical responses have been less frequent and not durable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors established and characterized a neuroblastoma cell line (CHLA-171) from a patient who died of progressive disease after treatment with BSO and low-dose L-PAM. RESULTS:CHLA-171 lacks MYCN amplification, expresses PGP (P-glycoprotein) 9.5 RNA, and shows cell surface antigen expression (human leukocyte antigen class I weakly positive, but HSAN 1.2 (hybridoma, SAN 1.2) and anti-GD2 (anti-ganglioside GD2 antibody) strongly positive) characteristic of neuroblastoma cell lines. Twenty-four hours of BSO treatment (0-1,000 micromol/L) maximally depleted CHLA-171 glutathione to 36% of baseline. The cytotoxic response of CHLA-171 to BSO and L-PAM, alone and in combination, was measured by digital image microscopy (DIMSCAN) over a range of drug concentrations and compared with drug levels obtained in the patient during BSO/L-PAM therapy. As single agents, CHLA-171 was highly resistant to L-PAM (LD90 = 42 micromol/L; peak plasma concentration in the patient equals 3.9 micromol/L) and moderately resistant to BSO (LD90 = 509 micromol/L; steady-state concentration in the patient equals 397 micromol/L). Treatment with a 10:1 (BSO:L-PAM) fixed ratio combination synergistically overcame resistance (3-4 logs of cell kill, combination index <1) at clinically achievable levels of BSO (100-400 micromol/L) and levels of L-PAM (10-40 micromol/L) clinically achievable only with hematopoietic stem cell support. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro results obtained for CHLA-171 suggest that BSO/L-PAM therapy may be optimally effective for drug-resistant neuroblastoma using myeloablative doses of L-PAM.
Authors: Melissa A Fath; Iman M Ahmad; Carmen J Smith; Jacquelyn Spence; Douglas R Spitz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jules Lin; Duna A Raoof; Dafydd G Thomas; Joel K Greenson; Thomas J Giordano; Gregory S Robinson; Maureen J Bourner; Christopher T Bauer; Mark B Orringer; David G Beer Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Konstantinos V Floros; Ayesha T Chawla; Mia O Johnson-Berro; Rishabh Khatri; Angeliki M Stamatouli; Sosipatros A Boikos; Mikhail G Dozmorov; L Ashley Cowart; Anthony C Faber Journal: Cell Stress Date: 2022-01-17
Authors: Judith G Villablanca; Samuel L Volchenboum; Hwangeui Cho; Min H Kang; Susan L Cohn; Clarke P Anderson; Araz Marachelian; Susan Groshen; Denice Tsao-Wei; Katherine K Matthay; John M Maris; Charlotte E Hasenauer; Scarlett Czarnecki; Hollie Lai; Fariba Goodarzian; Hiro Shimada; Charles Patrick Reynolds Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 3.167