Literature DB >> 11878749

Assessment of hair mineral analysis commercially offered in Germany.

Gustav Drasch1, Gabriele Roider.   

Abstract

To evaluate intra- and inter-laboratory agreement concerning hair mineral analysis and interpretation of results, hair samples from 2 volunteers were sent to seven laboratories, which commercially offer hair mineral analysis in Germany. 6 weeks later, another identical part from the hair sample of volunteer 1 was sent to all seven labs. Altogether, 50 elements were analyzed, 23 by all seven labs. For comparability, only the results for these 23 elements were assessed. The intra-laboratory reproducibility was evaluated by the 2 identical hair samples from volunteer 1. On the average, the reproducibility seems to be sufficient (median +/- 9.48% to +/- 20.59%), but for individual elements there were unacceptable out-rulers up to 100%. Only one lab classified all elements of the first and the second analysis of the identical hair sample in the same category (below, within, or above normal range). The others grouped 4 to 7 elements different. This is not tolerable. The inter-laboratory comparability was assessed by the results of the hair samples of both volunteers. For the sample of volunteer 1 at least the results of 6 (out of 23) elements were within an acceptable range of +/- 30% from the consensus value (= mean of all seven labs). For volunteer 2 this was only the case for 2 (!) elements. Differences of more than 100% were found for most other elements. Moreover, in the vast majority of the tested elements there was no comparability of the cLassification to the respective reference ranges of the different laboratories. For example, for volunteer 1 only 3 elements (our of 23!) were identically classified by all seven labs. As neither the analytical results nor the classification to the individual reference ranges by the laboratories correspond in tolerable borders, conclusions, drawn from these results, cannot be valid. Hair mineral analysis from these laboratories is unreliable. Therefore we must recommend to refrain from using such analysis to assess individual nutritional status or suspected environmental exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11878749     DOI: 10.1016/S0946-672X(02)80005-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trace Elem Med Biol        ISSN: 0946-672X            Impact factor:   3.849


  4 in total

1.  The content of essential and toxic elements in the hair of the mane of the trotter horses depending on their speed.

Authors:  Valeriy Kalashnikov; Aleksandr Zajcev; Mihail Atroshchenko; Sergey Miroshnikov; Alexey Frolov; Oleg Zav'yalov; Liliya Kalinkova; Tatyana Kalashnikova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Development and characterization of reference materials for trace element analysis of keratinized matrices.

Authors:  Mina W Tehrani; Karl X Yang; Patrick J Parsons
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Statistical resolutions for large variabilities in hair mineral analysis.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Nakamura; Tomomi Yamada; Koshi Kataoka; Koichiro Sera; Todd Saunders; Toshihiro Takatsuji; Toshio Makie; Yoshiaki Nose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reliability on intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory data of hair mineral analysis comparing with blood analysis.

Authors:  Sun Namkoong; Seung Phil Hong; Myung Hwa Kim; Byung Cheol Park
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 1.444

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.