Literature DB >> 11878364

Birth centre or labour ward? A comparison of the clinical outcomes of low-risk women in a NSW hospital.

C Homer1, G Davis, P Petocz, L Barclay, D Matha, M Chapman.   

Abstract

A number of birth centres were established in New South Wales as a result of the Shearman Report (NSW Health Department 1989). The objective of this study was to compare the obstetric outcomes, primarily caesarean section rates, of low-risk women presenting in spontaneous labour to the birth centre with those attending the hospital's conventional labour ward. The study showed that there was no significant difference in the caesarean section rate between the groups (3.5% in the birth centre and 4.3% in the labour ward). We suggest that the site of birthing does not affect clinical outcomes for low-risk women at this hospital. These results are relevant to contemporary clinical practice as they question the basis upon which birth centres have been popularised, that is, the medicalisation of birth in conventional labour wards increases intervention rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11878364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0813-0531            Impact factor:   0.647


  3 in total

1.  Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qian Long; Emma R Allanson; Jennifer Pontre; Özge Tunçalp; George Justus Hofmeyr; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2016-09-02

2.  Mapping the trajectories for women and their babies from births planned at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between 2000 and 2012.

Authors:  Vanessa L Scarf; Rosalie Viney; Serena Yu; Maralyn Foureur; Chris Rossiter; Hannah Dahlen; Charlene Thornton; Seong Leang Cheah; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 - 2012: a linked population data study.

Authors:  Caroline S E Homer; Seong L Cheah; Chris Rossiter; Hannah G Dahlen; David Ellwood; Maralyn J Foureur; Della A Forster; Helen L McLachlan; Jeremy J N Oats; David Sibbritt; Charlene Thornton; Vanessa L Scarf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.