Literature DB >> 11877930

Effect of ventricular fibrillation duration on the defibrillation threshold in humans.

Rainer Gradaus1, Lucas Bode-Schnurbus, Max Weber, Jürgen Rötker, Dieter Hammel, Günter Breithardt, Dirk Böcker.   

Abstract

Early during ventricular fibrillation, the defibrillation threshold may be low, as ventricular fibrillation most probably arises from a localized area with only a few wavefronts and the effects of global ischemia, ventricular dilatation, and sympathetic discharge have not yet fully developed. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of the timing of shock delivery in humans. During implantation of an ICD in 26 patients (24 men, 60 +/- 11 years, 19 coronary artery disease, NYHA 2.2 +/- 0.4, left ventricular ejection fraction 0.42 +/- 0.16), the defibrillation threshold was determined after approximately 10 and 2 seconds of ventricular fibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by T wave shocks. Mean defibrillation threshold was 9.9 +/- 3.6 J after 10.3 +/- 1.0 seconds. Within 2 seconds, 20 of 26 patients could be successfully defibrillated with < or = 8 J. In these patients, the mean defibrillation threshold was 4.0 +/- 2.1 J after 1.4 +/- 0.3 seconds compared to 9.5 +/- 3.1 J after 10.2 +/- 1.1 seconds (P < 0.001). There were no clinical differences between patients who could be successfully defibrillated within 2 seconds and those patients without successful defibrillation within 2 seconds. In the majority of patients, the defibrillation threshold was significantly lower within the first few cycles of ventricular fibrillation than after 10 seconds of ventricular fibrillation. These results should lead to exploration of earlier shock delivery in implantable devices. This could possibly reduce the incidence of syncope in patients with rapid ventricular tachyarrhythmias and ICDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11877930     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00014.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

1.  [Is intraoperative ICD-testing still necessary?].

Authors:  C Mewis; H-R Neuberger; A Buob
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2010-06

2.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01

3.  Orthostatic increase in defibrillation threshold leading to defibrillation failure and prolonged cardiac arrest in a sitting position: Lessons from a patient's near-fatal experience.

Authors:  Xiaoke Liu; Samuel Asirvatham; G Glenn Kabell
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2016-03-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.