Literature DB >> 11877764

Rationales, evidence, and design considerations for fractionated radioimmunotherapy.

Gerald L DeNardo1, Jeffery Schlom, Donald J Buchsbaum, Ruby F Meredith, Joseph A O'Donoghue, George Sgouros, John L Humm, Sally J DeNardo.   

Abstract

Although fractionation can be used in a discrete radiobiologic sense, herein it is generally used in the broader context of administration of multiple, rather than single, doses of radionuclide for radioimmunotherapy (RIT) or other targeted radionuclide therapies. Fractionation is a strategy for overcoming heterogeneity of monoclonal antibody (MAb) distribution in the tumor and the consequent nonuniformity of tumor radiation doses. Additional advantages of fractionated RIT are the ability to 1) provide patient-specific radionuclide and radiation dosing, 2) control toxicity by titration of the individual patient, 3) reduce toxicity, 4) increase the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for many patients, 5) increase tumor radiation dose and efficacy, and 6) prolong tumor response by permitting treatment over time. However, fractionated RIT has logistic and economic implications. Preclinical and clinical data substantiate the advantages of fractionated RIT, although the radiobiology for conventional external beam radiotherapy does not provide a straightforward rationale for RIT unless fractionation leads to more uniform distribution of radiation dose throughout the tumor. Preclinical data have shown that toxicity and mortality can be reduced while efficacy is increased, thereby providing inferential evidence of greater uniformity of radiation dose. Direct evidence of superior dosimetry and tumor activity distribution has also been found. Clinical data have shown that toxicity can be better controlled and reduced and the MTD extended for many patients. It is clear that fractionated RIT can only fulfill its potential if the effects of critical issues, such as the number and amount of radionuclide doses, the radionuclide physical and effective half-life, and the dose interval, are better characterized. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11877764     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  24 in total

1.  Pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound increases penetration and therapeutic efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in murine xenograft tumors.

Authors:  Shutao Wang; In Soo Shin; Hilary Hancock; Beom-su Jang; Hyung-sub Kim; Sang Myung Lee; Vesna Zderic; Victor Frenkel; Ira Pastan; Chang H Paik; Matthew R Dreher
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Ron J Keizer; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Anti-CD22 90Y-epratuzumab tetraxetan combined with anti-CD20 veltuzumab: a phase I study in patients with relapsed/refractory, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Thomas E Witzig; Michael B Tomblyn; Jamal G Misleh; Ebenezer A Kio; Robert M Sharkey; William A Wegener; David M Goldenberg
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Clinical radioimmunotherapy--the role of radiobiology.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Isabelle Navarro-Teulon; Manuel Bardiès; Nicolas Chouin; Guillaume Cartron; André Pèlegrin; David Azria
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Predicting hematologic toxicity in patients undergoing radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan or 131I-tositumomab.

Authors:  Sébastien Baechler; Robert F Hobbs; Heather A Jacene; François O Bochud; Richard L Wahl; George Sgouros
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Improving external beam radiotherapy by combination with internal irradiation.

Authors:  A Dietrich; L Koi; K Zöphel; W Sihver; J Kotzerke; M Baumann; M Krause
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Auger radiation targeted into DNA: a therapy perspective.

Authors:  Franz Buchegger; Florence Perillo-Adamer; Yves M Dupertuis; Angelika Bischof Delaloye
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Aligning physics and physiology: Engineering antibodies for radionuclide delivery.

Authors:  Wen-Ting K Tsai; Anna M Wu
Journal:  J Labelled Comp Radiopharm       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 1.921

Review 9.  Radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: from the 'magic bullets' to 'radioactive magic bullets'.

Authors:  Murthy R Chamarthy; Scott C Williams; Renee M Moadel
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 10.  Three-dimensional imaging-based radiobiological dosimetry.

Authors:  George Sgouros; Eric Frey; Richard Wahl; Bin He; Andrew Prideaux; Robert Hobbs
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.