Literature DB >> 11877542

Management of gallstone pancreatitis: effects of deviation from clinical guidelines.

K Sargen1, A N Kingsnorth.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Recently published management guidelines for acute pancreatitis provide a standard against which practice can be measured. Specifically it is recommended all patients with gallstone induced pancreatitis have definitive clearance of gallstones within four weeks.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if practice in our institution followed these guidelines and to analyse the effects of delayed clearance of gallstones.
METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive patients with gallstone pancreatitis presenting within a 15 month period were prospectively studied to compare management with national guidelines and to determine rates of recurrent biliary-pancreatic disease due to delay in clearance of gallstones.
RESULTS: Only 5 of 76 patients (6.6%) had operative removal of gallstones within four weeks of their episode of acute pancreatitis. Only 34 of 76 patients (44.7%) had their gallstones removed during the follow up period (minimum 8 months). Fourteen of 76 patients (18.4%) had unplanned readmissions to hospital with biliary-pancreatic disease, necessitating a total of 135 days in hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: It is clear from this study that guidelines for the management of gallstone acute pancreatitis are not being met, resulting in high rates of readmission with related disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11877542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JOP        ISSN: 1590-8577


  12 in total

1.  Implementation of a novel emergency surgical unit significantly improves the management of gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  S Bokhari; M Kulendran; L Liasis; K Qurashi; M Sen; S Gould
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Andrew Kingsnorth; Derek O'Reilly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

3.  Timing of cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis: do the data support current guidelines?

Authors:  Kaori Ito; Hiromichi Ito; Edward E Whang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Population-based observational study of acute pancreatitis in southern England.

Authors:  Alex Mirnezami; Ben Knight; Brendan Moran; Fergus Noble; Graham Branagan; John Primrose; Katherine Pearson; Malcolm West; Nathan Curtis; Phil Pucher; Ramsey Cuttress; Sian Pugh; Tim Underwood
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  The impact of empiric endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy on future gallstone-related complications in patients with non-severe acute biliary pancreatitis whose cholecystectomy was deferred or not performed.

Authors:  Wiriyaporn Ridtitid; Santi Kulpatcharapong; Panida Piyachaturawat; Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon; Pradermchai Kongkam; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy are reasonable alternatives to index cholecystectomy in severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (GSP).

Authors:  Pandanaboyana Sanjay; Sim Yeeting; Carole Whigham; Hannah Judson; Francesco M Polignano; Iain S Tait
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Inflammatory pancreatic diseases in older patients: recognition and management.

Authors:  Generoso Uomo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Gallstone pancreatitis: when is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography truly necessary?

Authors:  Matthias Kraft; Markus M Lerch
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-04

9.  A blended knowledge translation initiative to improve colorectal cancer staging [ISRCTN56824239].

Authors:  Frances C Wright; Calvin H L Law; Linda D Last; Neil Klar; David P Ryan; Andrew J Smith
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Cholecystectomy and sphincterotomy in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis in Sweden 1988 - 2003: a nationwide register study.

Authors:  Birger Sandzén; Markku M Haapamäki; Erik Nilsson; Hans C Stenlund; Mikael Oman
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.