Literature DB >> 11874911

Sexually dimorphic development of mouse primordial germ cells: switching from oogenesis to spermatogenesis.

Ian R Adams1, Anne McLaren.   

Abstract

During embryogenesis, primordial germ cells (PGCs) have the potential to enter either spermatogenesis or oogenesis. In a female genital ridge, or in a non-gonadal environment, PGCs develop as meiotic oocytes. However, male gonadal somatic cells inhibit PGCs from entering meiosis and direct them to a spermatogenic fate. We have examined the ability of PGCs from male and female embryos to respond to the masculinising environment of the male genital ridge, defining a temporal window during which PGCs retain a bipotential fate. To help understand how PGCs respond to the male gonadal environment, we have identified molecular differences between male PGCs that are committed to spermatogenesis and bipotential female PGCs. Our results suggest that one way in which PGCs respond to this masculinising environment is to synthesise prostaglandin D(2). We show that this signalling molecule can partially masculinise female embryonic gonads in culture, probably by inducing female supporting cells to differentiate into Sertoli cells. In the developing testis, prostaglandin D(2) may act as a paracrine factor to induce Sertoli cell differentiation. Thus part of the response of PGCs to the male gonadal environment is to generate a masculinising feedback loop to ensure male differentiation of the surrounding gonadal somatic cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11874911     DOI: 10.1242/dev.129.5.1155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  96 in total

1.  Meiotic germ cells antagonize mesonephric cell migration and testis cord formation in mouse gonads.

Authors:  Humphrey H-C Yao; Leo DiNapoli; Blanche Capel
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Male differentiation of germ cells induced by embryonic age-specific Sertoli cells in mice.

Authors:  Kohei Ohta; Miyuki Yamamoto; Yanling Lin; Nathanael Hogg; Haruhiko Akiyama; Richard R Behringer; Yukiko Yamazaki
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 3.  The birds and the bees and the flowers and the trees: lessons from genetic mapping of sex determination in plants and animals.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  What a difference a day makes! The contribution of intrinsic FGF9 signalling to germline masculinisation.

Authors:  Kate L Loveland
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Genomic imprinting of XX spermatogonia and XX oocytes recovered from XX<-->XY chimeric testes.

Authors:  Ayako Isotani; Tomoko Nakanishi; Shin Kobayashi; Jiyoung Lee; Shinichiro Chuma; Norio Nakatsuji; Fumitoshi Ishino; Masaru Okabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The road to maleness: from testis to Wolffian duct.

Authors:  Ivraym Barsoum; Humphrey Hung-Chang Yao
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 7.  SRY and the standoff in sex determination.

Authors:  Leo DiNapoli; Blanche Capel
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2007-07-31

8.  Normalizing gene expression levels in mouse fetal germ cells.

Authors:  Jocelyn A van den Bergen; Denise C Miles; Andrew H Sinclair; Patrick S Western
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 9.  Genetic mechanisms underlying male sex determination in mammals.

Authors:  R P Piprek
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  To beta or not to beta: canonical beta-catenin signaling pathway and ovarian development.

Authors:  Sergei G Tevosian; Nikolay L Manuylov
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.780

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.