Literature DB >> 11874888

Selective in vivo depletion of CD4(+) T lymphocytes with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody during acute infection of calves with Anaplasma marginale.

Reginald A Valdez1, Travis C McGuire, Wendy C Brown, William C Davis, Jeffrey M Jordan, Donald P Knowles.   

Abstract

To investigate the in vivo role of CD4(+) T lymphocytes during acute anaplasmosis, thymectomized calves were selectively depleted of CD4(+) T lymphocytes by treatment with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (MAb) and were then infected with the Florida strain of Anaplasma marginale in two sequential experiments (experiments 1 and 2). Treatment of thymectomized calves with a total of 5.0 mg of anti-CD4 MAb/kg of body weight during the 1st week followed by 0.3-mg/kg doses administered twice weekly for 7 weeks resulted in significant depletion of CD3(+) CD4(+) and CD4(+) CD45R(+) (naive) T lymphocytes from blood, spleen, and peripheral lymph nodes for the duration of the 8-week study, compared to the results for thymectomized control calves treated with a subclass-matched MAb. All calves became parasitemic and pyretic following experimental infection with A. marginale, and decreases in packed cell volume (PCV) coincided with peak parasitemia. No significant differences in PCV or parasitemia were observed between treatment groups. Thymectomized calves treated with anti-CD4 MAb were able to mount an anti-A. marginale antibody response, although in experiment 2, anti-CD4 MAb-treated calves had four- to sixfold lower immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and no detectable IgG2 anti-A. marginale major surface protein 2-specific antibody titers compared to thymectomized control calves treated with a subclass-matched MAb. At the level of CD4(+)-T-lymphocyte depletion achieved and experimental anaplasmosis induced, thymectomized anti-CD4 MAb-treated calves were able to control acute anaplasmosis. This was in contrast to the prediction that significant depletion of CD4(+) T lymphocytes would abrogate resistance to acute infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11874888      PMCID: PMC119926          DOI: 10.1128/cdli.9.2.417-424.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol        ISSN: 1071-412X


  43 in total

1.  Anaplasma marginale infection in young and aged cattle.

Authors:  W E Jones; I O Kliewer; B B Norman; W E Brock
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 1.156

2.  Biased immunoglobulin G1 isotype responses induced in cattle with DNA expressing msp1a of Anaplasma marginale.

Authors:  A Arulkanthan; W C Brown; T C McGuire; D P Knowles
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Interleukin-12 as an adjuvant promotes immunoglobulin G and type 1 cytokine recall responses to major surface protein 2 of the ehrlichial pathogen Anaplasma marginale.

Authors:  W Tuo; G H Palmer; T C McGuire; D Zhu; W C Brown
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Individual antigens of cattle. Bovine CD2 (BoCD2).

Authors:  W C Davis; G S Splitter
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.046

5.  Gammadelta T cells present antigen to CD4+ alphabeta T cells.

Authors:  R A Collins; D Werling; S E Duggan; A P Bland; K R Parsons; C J Howard
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.962

6.  Immunization of cattle with a 36-kilodalton surface protein induces protection against homologous and heterologous Anaplasma marginale challenge.

Authors:  G H Palmer; S M Oberle; A F Barbet; W L Goff; W C Davis; T C McGuire
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Serologic and clinical responses of premunized, vaccinated, and previously infected cattle to challenge exposure by two different Anaplasma marginale isolates.

Authors:  K L Kuttler; J L Zaugg; L W Johnson
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  In vivo role of lymphocyte subpopulations in the control of virus excretion and mucosal antibody responses of cattle infected with rotavirus.

Authors:  G Oldham; J C Bridger; C J Howard; K R Parsons
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Cross-reactivity of monoclonal antibodies to Escherichia coli J5 with heterologous gram-negative bacteria and extracted lipopolysaccharides.

Authors:  M K Aydintug; T J Inzana; T Letonja; W C Davis; L B Corbeil
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  The immunoprotective Anaplasma marginale major surface protein 2 is encoded by a polymorphic multigene family.

Authors:  G H Palmer; G Eid; A F Barbet; T C McGuire; T F McElwain
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Antigens and alternatives for control of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle.

Authors:  Katherine M Kocan; José de la Fuente; Alberto A Guglielmone; Roy D Meléndez
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Functional and immunological relevance of Anaplasma marginale major surface protein 1a sequence and structural analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz; Lygia M F Passos; Katarzyna Lis; Rachel Kenneil; James J Valdés; Joana Ferrolho; Miray Tonk; Anna E Pohl; Libor Grubhoffer; Erich Zweygarth; Varda Shkap; Mucio F B Ribeiro; Agustín Estrada-Peña; Katherine M Kocan; José de la Fuente
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.