Literature DB >> 11874089

Late entry into prenatal care in a rural setting.

Daniel Chandler1.   

Abstract

Social support, behavioral risk, and structural or demographic variables as well as acceptance of pregnancy were tested as determinants of late entry into prenatal care in a sample of 176 women in a rural county in California. The respondents were all those over age 18 served by four obstetric practices during a 4-month period ending in February 2000. One nurse-midwifery practice was included. Late entry into prenatal care during the first trimester occurred in 27.3% of the cases overall. Statistically significant independent variables in bivariate analyses were modeled in multivariate logistic regression. Stress, lack of family and friend support. Medicaid enrollment, age under 20 or over 34, low acceptance of pregnancy, and lack of a high school diploma were all predictors of late entry. Lack of family and friend support modified the effects of stress and Medicaid as payer. Although the determinants of late entry were remarkably complex in this sample, they have potential for public health intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11874089     DOI: 10.1016/s1526-9523(01)00214-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  9 in total

1.  The Association Between Preconception Care Receipt and the Timeliness and Adequacy of Prenatal Care: An Examination of Multistate Data from Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2009-2011.

Authors:  Meghan K Wally; Larissa R Brunner Huber; L Michele Issel; Michael E Thompson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-01

2.  Pioneer baby: suggestions for pre- and postnatal health promotion programs from rural English and Spanish-speaking pregnant and postpartum women.

Authors:  Lisette T Jacobson; Rosalee Zackula; Michelle L Redmond; Jennifer Duong; Tracie C Collins
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-02

3.  [Predictors of use of ante-natal care].

Authors:  I Valadez Figueroa; N Alfaro Alfaro; A Celis de la Rosa
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Home or away? Factors affecting where women choose to give birth.

Authors:  Barbara Zelek; Eliseo Orrantia; Heather Poole; Jessica Strike
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  When homogeneity meets heterogeneity: the geographically weighted regression with spatial lag approach to prenatal care utilization.

Authors:  Carla Shoff; Vivian Yi-Ju Chen; Tse-Chuan Yang
Journal:  Geospat Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.212

6.  Explaining ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry by predisposing, enabling and need factors in The Netherlands. The Generation R Study.

Authors:  A A Choté; G T Koopmans; W K Redekop; C J M de Groot; R J Hoefman; V W V Jaddoe; A Hofman; E A P Steegers; J P Mackenbach; M Trappenburg; M Foets
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-08

7.  Antenatal depressive symptoms and maternal health care utilisation: a population-based study of pregnant women in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tesera Bitew; Charlotte Hanlon; Eskinder Kebede; Girmay Medhin; Abebaw Fekadu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Electronic Monitoring Of Mom's Schedule (eMOMS™): Protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial to improve postpartum weight, blood sugars, and breastfeeding among high BMI women.

Authors:  Lisette T Jacobson; Tracie C Collins; Meredith Lucas; Rosey Zackula; Hayrettin Okut; Niaman Nazir; David Robbins; Judy E Stern; Michael Wolfe; David A Grainger
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-04-08

9.  National health insurance, social influence and antenatal care use in Ghana.

Authors:  Nkechi S Owoo; Monica P Lambon-Quayefio
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2013-08-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.