Literature DB >> 11874008

A comparative evaluation of oral midazolam with other sedatives as premedication in pediatric dentistry.

Neerja Singh1, R K Pandey, A K Saksena, J N Jaiswal.   

Abstract

The purpose of present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of orally administered midazolam in children as a sedative agent and to compare it with two other older agents, triclofos and promethazine. The study was conducted on ninety child patients requiring some short dental procedure. All the patients were with a good physical status (ASA-I). The ages ranged between 3 and 9 years. The patients were randomized into three study groups: Group 1, midazolam, Group II, triclofos and Group III, promethazine, on the basis of the drugs to be administered. After administration of drugs in each group, the effects were evaluated in terms of onset of action, sedative effect, ease of treatment completion, recovery time and postoperative amnesia. Midazolam was found to be the best drug among the three to produce conscious sedation in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11874008     DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.2.j714x4795474mr2p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 1053-4628            Impact factor:   1.065


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of the sedative effect of oral versus nasal midazolam combined with nitrous oxide in uncooperative children.

Authors:  I E Musani; N V Chandan
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-05-05

2.  A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine.

Authors:  Marianne M Sheroan; Diane C Dilley; Warner J Lucas; William F Vann
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

3.  Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.

Authors:  Paul F Ashley; Mohsin Chaudhary; Liege Lourenço-Matharu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-17

4.  Preanesthetic sedation of preschool children: Comparison of intranasal midazolam versus oral promethazine.

Authors:  Ashu Mathai; Marilynn Nazareth; Rinu Susan Raju
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jan-Jun

Review 5.  What is the level of evidence for the amnestic effects of sedatives in pediatric patients? A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Karolline Alves Viana; Anelise Daher; Lucianne Cople Maia; Paulo Sucasas Costa; Carolina de Castro Martins; Saul Martins Paiva; Luciane Rezende Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of Intranasal Sedation Using Ketamine and Midazolam on Behavior of 3-6 Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Office: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Majid Mehran; Sara Tavassoli-Hojjati; Nazila Ameli; Mehdi Salehi Zeinabadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01

7.  Efficacy of Chloral Hydrate and Promethazine for Sedation during Electroencephalography in Children; a Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Fallah Razieh; Jalili Sharam; Golestan Motahhareh; Akhavan Karbasi Sedighah; Jarahzadeh Mohammad-Hosein
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.364

8.  Is midazolam superior to triclofos and hydroxyzine as premedicant in children?

Authors:  Sujata Chaudhary; Reena Jindal; Gautam Girotra; Rashmi Salhotra; Rajesh Singh Rautela; Ashok Kumar Sethi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01

9.  A comparative study of the sedative effect of oral midazolam and oral promethazine medication in lumbar puncture.

Authors:  Hojjat Derakhshanfar; Mona Modanlookordi; Afshin Amini; Ali Shahrami
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2013

10.  Efficacy of midazolam as oral premedication in children in comparison to triclofos sodium.

Authors:  Kolathu Parambil Radhika; Melveetil S Sreejit; Konnanath T Ramadas
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.