OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and impact of a health education intervention promoting partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). METHODS: The research setting was a busy public health clinic in a rural district in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. A before/after quantitative study design was used to measure the effect of an audiovisual presentation of a compelling love drama, posters, and pamphlets. Measures collected from all consenting STD index patients during a 6 week pre-intervention (control) phase were compared with those collected during a 6 week intervention phase. A qualitative evaluation assessed whether the intervention accurately portrayed the intended educational messages. RESULTS: 150 index patients (55% female) were interviewed in the control phase and 185 index patients (64% female) in the intervention phase. The intervention phase showed improvements on several measures of self efficacy about notifying casual partners, such as a belief among index patients that a greater proportion of their casual partners would see the importance of seeking treatment as a result of their notification interaction. The rate of contact cards returned per index patient was 0.27 in the intervention phase, compared with 0.20 in the control phase (95% CI for the rate difference: -0.05, 0.17). The qualitative research found that the intervention was thoroughly enjoyed by patients and clinicians, but a fundamental problem with it was that patients received confused messages about the relation between HIV/AIDS and other STDs. This has potentially negative consequences for partner notification. CONCLUSION: The intervention needs further development, and then could provide a highly acceptable, cost effective model for health education in clinics in developing countries.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and impact of a health education intervention promoting partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). METHODS: The research setting was a busy public health clinic in a rural district in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. A before/after quantitative study design was used to measure the effect of an audiovisual presentation of a compelling love drama, posters, and pamphlets. Measures collected from all consenting STD index patients during a 6 week pre-intervention (control) phase were compared with those collected during a 6 week intervention phase. A qualitative evaluation assessed whether the intervention accurately portrayed the intended educational messages. RESULTS: 150 index patients (55% female) were interviewed in the control phase and 185 index patients (64% female) in the intervention phase. The intervention phase showed improvements on several measures of self efficacy about notifying casual partners, such as a belief among index patients that a greater proportion of their casual partners would see the importance of seeking treatment as a result of their notification interaction. The rate of contact cards returned per index patient was 0.27 in the intervention phase, compared with 0.20 in the control phase (95% CI for the rate difference: -0.05, 0.17). The qualitative research found that the intervention was thoroughly enjoyed by patients and clinicians, but a fundamental problem with it was that patients received confused messages about the relation between HIV/AIDS and other STDs. This has potentially negative consequences for partner notification. CONCLUSION: The intervention needs further development, and then could provide a highly acceptable, cost effective model for health education in clinics in developing countries.
Authors: C Mathews; A van Rensburg; G Schierhout; N Coetzee; C J Lombard; H G Fehler; R C Ballard Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Ann E Kurth; Lauren McClelland; George Wanje; Annette E Ghee; Norbert Peshu; Esther Mutunga; Walter Jaoko; Marta Storwick; King K Holmes; Scott McClelland Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: E James Essien; Osaro Mgbere; Emmanuel Monjok; Ernest Ekong; Marcia M Holstad; Seth C Kalichman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Nazmul Alam; Eric Chamot; Sten H Vermund; Kim Streatfield; Sibylle Kristensen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Alberta L Wang; Rui-Rui Peng; Joseph D Tucker; Hrishikesh Chakraborty; Myron S Cohen; Xiang-Sheng Chen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 3.240