Literature DB >> 11872478

Reversal of flagellar rotation is important in initial attachment of Escherichia coli to glass in a dynamic system with high- and low-ionic-strength buffers.

Jennifer W McClaine1, Roseanne M Ford.   

Abstract

The attachment rates of wild-type, smooth-swimming, tumbly, and paralyzed Escherichia coli to glass was measured at fluid velocities of 0.0044 and 0.044 cms(-1) (corresponding to shear rates of 0.34 and 3.4 s(-1), respectively), in 0.02 and 0.2 M buffer solutions. At the highest ionic strength, we did not observe a significant difference in the attachment rate of wild-type and paralyzed cells at either fluid velocity. However, when the ionic strength was reduced, paralyzed bacteria attached at rates 4 and 10 times lower than that of the wild type under fluid velocities of 0.0044 and 0.044 cms(-1), respectively. This suggested that the rotation of the flagella assisted in attachment. We then compared the attachment rates of smooth-swimming (counterclockwise rotation only) and tumbly (clockwise rotation only) cells to the wild type to determine whether the direction of rotation was important to cell attachment. At 0.0044 cms(-1), the smooth-swimming cells attached at rates similar to that of the wild type in both buffer solutions but significantly less at the higher fluid velocity. Tumbly cells attached at much lower rates under all conditions. Thus, the combination of clockwise and counterclockwise flagellar rotation and their coupling appeared to be important in cell attachment. We considered a number of hypotheses to interpret these observations, including a residence time analysis and a comparison of traditional Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory to soft-particle theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11872478      PMCID: PMC123756          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1280-1289.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  23 in total

1.  Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions--its mechanisms and methods for study.

Authors:  R Bos; H C van der Mei; H J Busscher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  Microbial Penetration through Nutrient-Saturated Berea Sandstone.

Authors:  G E Jenneman; M J McInerney; R M Knapp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bacterial adhesion: A physicochemical approach.

Authors:  M C van Loosdrecht; J Lyklema; W Norde; A J Zehnder
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Behavior ofPseudomonas fluorescens within the hydrodynamic boundary layers of surface microenvironments.

Authors:  J R Lawrence; P J Delaquis; D R Korber; D E Caldwell
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Three-dimensional tracking of motile bacteria near a solid planar surface.

Authors:  P D Frymier; R M Ford; H C Berg; P T Cummings
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration.

Authors:  A G Gristina
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Role of flagella in pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pulmonary infection.

Authors:  M Feldman; R Bryan; S Rajan; L Scheffler; S Brunnert; H Tang; A Prince
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Mechanisms of microbial movement in subsurface materials.

Authors:  P J Reynolds; P Sharma; G E Jenneman; M J McInerney
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Influence of ionic strength and substratum hydrophobicity on the co-adhesion of oral microbial pairs.

Authors:  R Bos; H C van der Mei; H J Busscher
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Difference in surface properties between Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus as revealed by electrophoretic mobility measurements.

Authors:  R Sonohara; N Muramatsu; H Ohshima; T Kondo
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.352

View more
  17 in total

1.  Reversible and irreversible adhesion of motile Escherichia coli cells analyzed by total internal reflection aqueous fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Margot A-S Vigeant; Roseanne M Ford; Michael Wagner; Lukas K Tamm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Physicochemical regulation of biofilm formation.

Authors:  Lars D Renner; Douglas B Weibel
Journal:  MRS Bull       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.578

Review 3.  Chemotaxis Control of Transient Cell Aggregation.

Authors:  Gladys Alexandre
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Species-dependent hydrodynamics of flagellum-tethered bacteria in early biofilm development.

Authors:  Rachel R Bennett; Calvin K Lee; Jaime De Anda; Kenneth H Nealson; Fitnat H Yildiz; George A O'Toole; Gerard C L Wong; Ramin Golestanian
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Dynamics of flagellum- and pilus-mediated association of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with contact lens surfaces.

Authors:  Victoria B Tran; Suzanne M J Fleiszig; David J Evans; Clayton J Radke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evidence for Escherichia coli Diguanylate Cyclase DgcZ Interlinking Surface Sensing and Adhesion via Multiple Regulatory Routes.

Authors:  Egidio Lacanna; Colette Bigosch; Volkhard Kaever; Alex Boehm; Anke Becker
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Development of surface adhesion in Caulobacter crescentus.

Authors:  Diane Bodenmiller; Evelyn Toh; Yves V Brun
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Oriented adhesion of Escherichia coli to polystyrene particles.

Authors:  Joseph F Jones; Jason D Feick; Daniel Imoudu; Nkiru Chukwumah; Margot Vigeant; Darrell Velegol
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  SadC reciprocally influences biofilm formation and swarming motility via modulation of exopolysaccharide production and flagellar function.

Authors:  Judith H Merritt; Kimberly M Brothers; Sherry L Kuchma; George A O'Toole
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Bacteria-surface interactions.

Authors:  Hannah H Tuson; Douglas B Weibel
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.