Literature DB >> 11871950

Remifentanil and the tunnelling phase of paediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. A double-blind, randomised, prospective study.

N Chambers1, T Lopez, J Thomas, M F M James.   

Abstract

Sixty-two children were randomly allocated to receive, during inhalational anaesthesia with isoflurane and nitrous oxide, either 1.0 microg x kg(-1) remifentanil (n = 33) or saline (n = 29) just before the tunnelling phase of ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion, in a double-blind study. The remifentanil group showed little stress response to tunnelling as indicated by median (interquartile range [range]) change in heart rate -5.2 (-11.4 to 9.8 [-19.4 to 30.4])%, mean arterial pressure -5.0 (-20.8 to 15.5 [-40.9 to 42.9])% or plasma norepinephrine -13.5 (-38.1 to -2.5 [-77.7 to 81.5])% compared with the saline group, in which the changes were 20.1 (11.5-36.1 [2.1-83.1])%, 42.7 (27.1-56.8 [3.2-73.5])% and 13.3 (0.8-70.0 [-45.2 to 337.5])%, respectively (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). These changes were consistent across most different age categories. The cardiovascular response in the saline group lasted for 8 (4-15 [0-39]) min. Tracheal extubation occurred after 3 (2-4 [1-8]) min in the remifentanil group and 3 (2-6 [0-15]) min in the saline group (p = 0.29), with transfer to the recovery area and discharge to the ward, respectively, 4 (4-5 [1-10]) min and 9 (7-13 [2-32]) min in the remifentanil group and 7 (4-8 [2-18]) min and 14 (10-19 [7-44]) min in the saline group (p = 0.06 and 0.01, respectively). Postoperatively there was some evidence of respiratory depression and increased oxygen requirements in all age categories, but this was similar in both groups. Overall, the maximum increase from baseline in transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension was 41.2 (11.3-66.7 [-2.0 to 141.7])% in the remifentanil group compared with 30.7 (20.5-55.1 [1.7-159])% in the saline group (p = 0.8), and the time taken for transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension to decrease to < 6.0 kPa was 4 (0-13 [0-60]) min compared with 7 (0-13 [0-60]) min, respectively (p = 0.75). There was no difference between the two groups in postoperative analgesic requirements or in blood loss and there were no significant side-effects. We conclude that remifentanil is an appropriate and safe analgesic to provide balanced anaesthesia to cover the tunnelling phase of paediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11871950     DOI: 10.1046/j.0003-2409.2001.02398.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

Review 1.  Remifentanil: applications in neonates.

Authors:  Mineto Kamata; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  [Anesthetic management of pediatric cleft lip and cleft palate repair].

Authors:  Andreas Machotta
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Experience with remifentanil in neonates and infants.

Authors:  Lars Welzing; Bernhard Roth
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Remifentanil update: clinical science and utility.

Authors:  Richard Beers; Enrico Camporesi
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  The use of ultra-short-acting opioids in paediatric anaesthesia: the role of remifentanil.

Authors:  Peter J Davis; Franklyn P Cladis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labor - monitoring of newborn heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation during the first 24 hours after delivery.

Authors:  Halina Konefał; Brygida Jaskot; Maria Beata Czeszyńska; Joanna Pastuszka
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.318

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.