Literature DB >> 11871928

The association of sex and payer status on management and subsequent survival in acute myocardial infarction.

John G Canto1, William J Rogers, Nisha C Chandra, William J French, Hal V Barron, Paul D Frederick, Charles Maynard, Nathan R Every.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have generally shown lower utilization of hospital resources and lower survival in women than men with acute myocardial infarction. However, to our knowledge, no reports have described the influence of payer status on the treatment and outcome of women and men with acute myocardial infarction.
METHODS: Baseline and clinical presenting characteristics, utilization of hospital resources, and subsequent clinical outcome were ascertained among 327 040 women and men enrolled in a national registry of myocardial infarction from June 1, 1994, to January 31, 1997. Separate Cox regression analyses were performed for Medicare, Medicaid, health maintenance organizations, and commercial payer groups to ascertain variables that were predictive of mortality in the study population.
RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in age and other baseline and presenting characteristics, women were significantly more likely than men to die in the hospital (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.16), and this difference was greatest among women with health maintenance organization and commercial insurance (hazard ratios, 1.30 and 1.29, respectively), and least among women with Medicare (hazard ratio, 1.07). However, after adjustment for the additional effect on short-term survival of sex differences in the utilization of both pharmacologic treatments administered within the first 24 hours and invasive cardiac procedures, the mortality difference observed for women and men further diminished (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.10).
CONCLUSION: In this large registry, we did not observe significant variations among payer classes in management and mortality among women and men after acute myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11871928     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.5.587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  6 in total

1.  Medication Management Among Medicaid Myocardial Infarction Survivors.

Authors:  Erica B Oberg; Annette L Fitzpatrick; William E Lafferty; James P Logerfo
Journal:  Wash State J Public Health Pract       Date:  2008-10

2.  Association of age and sex with myocardial infarction symptom presentation and in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  John G Canto; William J Rogers; Robert J Goldberg; Eric D Peterson; Nanette K Wenger; Viola Vaccarino; Catarina I Kiefe; Paul D Frederick; George Sopko; Zhi-Jie Zheng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  DOES MEDICARE SAVE LIVES?

Authors:  David Card; Carlos Dobkin; Nicole Maestas
Journal:  Q J Econ       Date:  2009

4.  Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: Outcomes and determinants of outcomes: A tertiary care center study from North India.

Authors:  Gajendra Dubey; Sunil Kumar Verma; Vinay Kumar Bahl
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-11-30

5.  The future impact of population growth and aging on coronary heart disease in China: projections from the Coronary Heart Disease Policy Model-China.

Authors:  Andrew Moran; Dong Zhao; Dongfeng Gu; Pamela Coxson; Chung-Shiuan Chen; Jun Cheng; Jing Liu; Jiang He; Lee Goldman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Secondary prevention of myocardial infarction with nonpharmacologic strategies in a Medicaid cohort.

Authors:  Erica B Oberg; Annette L Fitzpatrick; William E Lafferty; James P LoGerfo
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 2.830

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.