Literature DB >> 11871920

Do subspecialists working outside of their specialty provide less efficient and lower-quality care to hospitalized patients than do primary care physicians?

Scott R Weingarten1, Lynne Lloyd, Chiun-Fang Chiou, Glenn D Braunstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies show that subspecialists can provide better quality care than primary care physicians when working within their subspecialty for patients with some medical conditions. However, many subspecialists care for patients outside of their chosen subspecialty. The present study compared the quality of care provided by subspecialists practicing outside of their specialty, general internists, and subspecialists practicing within their specialty.
METHODS: The severity-adjusted mortality rate and the severity-adjusted length of stay were used as indexes of quality of care. Data from 5112 hospital admissions (301 different physicians) for community-acquired pneumonia, acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage at 6 hospitals in the greater Cleveland, Ohio, area were used in this study. The data were severity adjusted with the CHOICE Severity of Illness System.
RESULTS: Subspecialists working outside of their subspecialty cared for 25% of hospitalized patients. When comparing patients cared for by subspecialists practicing outside of their subspecialty, severity-adjusted lengths of stay were longer for patients with congestive heart failure (23% longer; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-32%), upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (22% longer; 95% CI, 7%-39%), and community-acquired pneumonia (14% longer; 95% CI, 5%-24%) than for patients cared for by subspecialists practicing within their subspecialty. Patients also had a slightly higher hospital mortality rate when cared for by subspecialists practicing outside of their specialty than by subspecialists practicing within their subspecialty (mortality rate odds ratio, 1.46; P =.047). In addition, patients cared for by subspecialists practicing outside of their subspecialty had longer lengths of stay, and prolongations of stay were observed for patients with congestive heart failure (16% longer; 95% CI, 8%-26%), upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (15% longer; 95% CI, 2%-30%), and community-acquired pneumonia (18% longer; 95% CI, 9%-28%) than patients cared for by general internists.
CONCLUSIONS: Subspecialists commonly care for patients outside of their subspecialty, despite the fact that their patients may have longer lengths of stay than those cared for by subspecialists practicing within their specialty or by general internists. In addition, such patients may have slightly higher mortality rates than those cared for by subspecialists practicing within their subspecialty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11871920     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.5.527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  16 in total

1.  The future of general internal medicine. Report and recommendations from the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Task Force on the Domain of General Internal Medicine.

Authors:  Eric B Larson; Stephan D Fihn; Lynne M Kirk; Wendy Levinson; Ronald V Loge; Eileen Reynolds; Lewis Sandy; Steven Schroeder; Neil Wenger; Mark Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Factors associated with length of stay in hospital for suspected community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Jane Q Huang; Peter M Hooper; Thomas J Marrie
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 3.  A systematic review of health care efficiency measures.

Authors:  Peter S Hussey; Han de Vries; John Romley; Margaret C Wang; Susan S Chen; Paul G Shekelle; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Cost burden of non-specific chest pain admissions.

Authors:  J Groarke; J O'Brien; G Go; M Susanto; P Owens; A O Maree
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  General Internists Versus Specialists as Attendings for General Internal Medicine Inpatients at a Canadian Hospital: a Cohort Study.

Authors:  Anthony D Bai; Siddhartha Srivastava; Christopher A Smith; Sudeep S Gill
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Does Medical Expansion Improve Population Health?

Authors:  Hui Zheng; Linda K George
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2018-02-01

7.  Providing specialist services in Australia across barriers of distance and culture.

Authors:  Phillip J Carson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Evaluating the performance of inpatient attending physicians: a new instrument for today's teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Christopher A Smith; Anita B Varkey; Arthur T Evans; Brendan M Reilly
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary care planning in the primary care management of completed stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Mitchell; Robyn M Brown; Lars Erikssen; Jennifer J Tieman
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Hospitalists as teachers.

Authors:  Sunil Kripalani; Allison C Pope; Kimberly Rask; Kimberly Hunt; Daniel D Dressler; William T Branch; Rebecca Zhang; Mark V Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.