BACKGROUND: The acquisition of an androgen-independent phenotype is the most serious issue of prostate cancer treatment. Although several experimental cell models have been reported for studying androgen independence, they have limited applications related to hormone-refractory prostate cancer. To investigate the molecular mechanism of androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer, we established a useful LNCaP cell model that resembles the clinical scenario of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. METHODS: Androgen-sensitive LNCaP parental cells were continuously maintained in a regular cell-culture medium, that is, phenol red-positive RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and 1% glutamine. Upon passage, the androgen responsiveness of those cells decreased, to a level lower than that of parental cells. We examined the growth properties and androgen responsiveness of these different LNCaP cells in vitro and in vivo. Cytogenetic characteristics and expression of androgen receptors (ARs) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were determined. RESULTS: Upon continuous passage, the biological behavior of parental C-33 cells (passage number less than 33) was altered. C-81 cells (passage number higher than 81) clearly exhibited more aggressive growth and lower androgen responsiveness than C-33 and C-51 cells (passage number between 35 and 80) in vitro and in vivo. Nevertheless, all these cells expressed a similar level of functional AR protein as well as a similar genetic profile. Moreover, in a steroid-reduced culture condition, C-81 cells secreted a higher level of PSA than C-33 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our LNCaP cell model closely recapitulates the progression of human prostate cancer from the androgen-responsive to the hormone-refractory state under the androgen nondeprived condition. This cell model may provide the opportunity to understand the molecular mechanisms associated with the acquisition of androgen independence during human prostate cancer progression. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: The acquisition of an androgen-independent phenotype is the most serious issue of prostate cancer treatment. Although several experimental cell models have been reported for studying androgen independence, they have limited applications related to hormone-refractory prostate cancer. To investigate the molecular mechanism of androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer, we established a useful LNCaP cell model that resembles the clinical scenario of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. METHODS: Androgen-sensitive LNCaP parental cells were continuously maintained in a regular cell-culture medium, that is, phenol red-positive RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and 1% glutamine. Upon passage, the androgen responsiveness of those cells decreased, to a level lower than that of parental cells. We examined the growth properties and androgen responsiveness of these different LNCaP cells in vitro and in vivo. Cytogenetic characteristics and expression of androgen receptors (ARs) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were determined. RESULTS: Upon continuous passage, the biological behavior of parental C-33 cells (passage number less than 33) was altered. C-81 cells (passage number higher than 81) clearly exhibited more aggressive growth and lower androgen responsiveness than C-33 and C-51 cells (passage number between 35 and 80) in vitro and in vivo. Nevertheless, all these cells expressed a similar level of functional AR protein as well as a similar genetic profile. Moreover, in a steroid-reduced culture condition, C-81 cells secreted a higher level of PSA than C-33 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our LNCaP cell model closely recapitulates the progression of humanprostate cancer from the androgen-responsive to the hormone-refractory state under the androgen nondeprived condition. This cell model may provide the opportunity to understand the molecular mechanisms associated with the acquisition of androgen independence during humanprostate cancer progression. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Ajay P Singh; Sangeeta Bafna; Kunal Chaudhary; Ganesh Venkatraman; Lynette Smith; James D Eudy; Sonny L Johansson; Ming-Fong Lin; Surinder K Batra Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Dannah R Miller; Cherng-Chyi Tzeng; Trey Farmer; Evan T Keller; Steve Caplan; Yu-Shuin Chen; Yeh-Long Chen; Ming-Fong Lin Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Yuexing Zhang; Douglas Linn; Zhenqiu Liu; Jonathan Melamed; Fabio Tavora; Charles Y Young; Angelika M Burger; Anne W Hamburger Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Mark A Castanares; Ben T Copeland; Wasim H Chowdhury; Minzhi M Liu; Ronald Rodriguez; Martin G Pomper; Shawn E Lupold; Catherine A Foss Journal: Prostate Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 4.104