Literature DB >> 11870653

Rheological properties of acrylic bone cement during curing and the role of the size of the powder particles.

Gladius Lewis1, Michael Carroll.   

Abstract

A dynamic compressive rheometric technique was used to determine the true or complex viscosity (eta*) of three poly (methyl methacrylate), PMMA-based bone cement formulations (one commercially available and two experimental), as a function of the time that elapsed from commencement of hand mixing of the cement constituents (t). For each cement, two rheological parameters [namely, the time of onset of cure (t(ons)) and the critical cure rate (CCR), which is herein defined as the complex viscosity rate computed at t(ons)] were determined from the eta*-t data. For each cement, particle analysis was used to obtain the powder particle size distribution, from which the following parameters were obtained: (a) the overall mean particle diameter D(m), and (b) the relative amounts of small-sized PMMA beads (mean diameter d between 0 and 40 mum) (alpha) and large-sized PMMA beads (d > 75 mum) (beta). It is seen that the key particle parameter is not D(m) per se but alpha and beta. Thus, the highest values of t(ons) and CCR were obtained from a cement with the highest values of alpha and beta. An explanation for these trends is given, and two areas for further research work in this field are outlined. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 63: 191--199, 2002; DOI 10.1002/jbm.10127

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11870653     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of rheological properties of bone cements.

Authors:  M K D Nicholas; M G J Waters; K M Holford; G Adusei
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Direct and interactive effects of three variables on properties of PMMA bone cement for vertebral body augmentation.

Authors:  Alejandro López; Erik Unosson; Håkan Engqvist; Cecilia Persson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Comparison of an experimental bone cement with a commercial control, Hydroset.

Authors:  O M Clarkin; D Boyd; S Madigan; M R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  A Review of PMMA Bone Cement and Intra-Cardiac Embolism.

Authors:  Puneeth Shridhar; Yanfei Chen; Ramzi Khalil; Anton Plakseychuk; Sung Kwon Cho; Bryan Tillman; Prashant N Kumta; YoungJae Chun
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Preparation and Characterization of Injectable Brushite Filled-Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Bone Cement.

Authors:  Lucas C Rodriguez; Jonathan Chari; Shant Aghyarian; Izabelle M Gindri; Victor Kosmopoulos; Danieli C Rodrigues
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Experimental investigations of the aerated polymethylmethacrylate-based vertebral cement flow in capillaries.

Authors:  Zbigniew Tyfa; Dariusz Witkowski; Krzysztof Sobczak; Damian Obidowski; Krzysztof Jóźwik
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.595

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.