Literature DB >> 11870184

Phase II trial of murine (131)I-labeled antitenascin monoclonal antibody 81C6 administered into surgically created resection cavities of patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas.

David A Reardon1, Gamal Akabani, R Edward Coleman, Allan H Friedman, Henry S Friedman, James E Herndon, Ilkcan Cokgor, Roger E McLendon, Charles N Pegram, James M Provenzale, Jennifer A Quinn, Jeremy N Rich, Lorna V Regalado, John H Sampson, Timothy D Shafman, Carol J Wikstrand, Terence Z Wong, Xiao-Guang Zhao, Michael R Zalutsky, Darell D Bigner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of intraresection cavity (131)I-labeled murine antitenascin monoclonal antibody 81C6 and determine its true response rate among patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II trial, 120 mCi of (131)I-labeled murine 81C6 was injected directly into the surgically created resection cavity of 33 patients with previously untreated malignant glioma (glioblastoma multiforme [GBM], n = 27; anaplastic astrocytoma, n = 4; anaplastic oligodendroglioma, n = 2). Patients then received conventional external-beam radiotherapy followed by a year of alkylator-based chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Median survival for all patients and those with GBM was 86.7 and 79.4 weeks, respectively. Eleven patients remain alive at a median follow-up of 93 weeks (range, 49 to 220 weeks). Nine patients (27%) developed reversible hematologic toxicity, and histologically confirmed, treatment-related neurologic toxicity occurred in five patients (15%). One patient (3%) required reoperation for radionecrosis.
CONCLUSION: Median survival achieved with (131)I-labeled 81C6 exceeds that of historical controls treated with conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy, even after accounting for established prognostic factors including age and Karnofsky performance status. The median survival achieved with (131)I-labeled 81C6 compares favorably with either (125)I interstitial brachy-therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery and is associated with a significantly lower rate of reoperation for radionecrosis. Our results confirm the efficacy of (131)I-labeled 81C6 for patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma and suggest that a randomized phase III study is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11870184     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  54 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy for primary brain tumors: no longer a matter of privilege.

Authors:  Peter E Fecci; Amy B Heimberger; John H Sampson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Molecular targeting of angiogenesis for imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Simon S Brack; Ludger M Dinkelborg; Dario Neri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Matricellular proteins in drug delivery: Therapeutic targets, active agents, and therapeutic localization.

Authors:  Andrew J Sawyer; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 4.  Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs.

Authors:  C von Neubeck; A Seidlitz; H H Kitzler; B Beuthien-Baumann; M Krause
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Development of radioimmunotherapeutic and diagnostic antibodies: an inside-out view.

Authors:  C Andrew Boswell; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Microenvironment-a role in tumour progression and prognosis.

Authors:  Jaya Nagendra Krishna Muppalla; Keerthi Muddana; Shyam Prasad Reddy Dorankula; Madhusudan Rao Thokala; Ajay Prakash Pasupula
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-10

Review 7.  Planning for intracavitary anti-EGFR radionuclide therapy of gliomas. Literature review and data on EGFR expression.

Authors:  J Carlsson; Z P Ren; K Wester; A L Sundberg; N E Heldin; G Hesselager; M Persson; L Gedda; V Tolmachev; H Lundqvist; E Blomquist; M Nistér
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Controversies concerning the application of brachytherapy in central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Bo-Lin Liu; Jin-Xiang Cheng; Xiang Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Ependymoma in children: molecular considerations and therapeutic insights.

Authors:  J-H Kim; Y Huang; A S Griffin; P Rajappa; J P Greenfield
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  A pilot study: 131I-antitenascin monoclonal antibody 81c6 to deliver a 44-Gy resection cavity boost.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Michael R Zalutsky; Gamal Akabani; R Edward Coleman; Allan H Friedman; James E Herndon; Roger E McLendon; Charles N Pegram; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; Sridharan Guruangan; Susan Boulton; Renee H Raynor; Jeanette M Dowell; Terence Z Wong; Xiao-Guang Zhao; Henry S Friedman; Darell D Bigner
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.