Literature DB >> 11870174

Quality-of-life-adjusted survival analysis of high-dose adjuvant interferon alpha-2b for high-risk melanoma patients using intergroup clinical trial data.

Kerry L Kilbridge1, Bernard F Cole, John M Kirkwood, Frank G Haluska, Michael A Atkins, John C Ruckdeschel, Dana E Sock, Robert F Nease, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High-dose adjuvant interferon alpha-2b (IFN alpha 2b) for high-risk melanoma is a 1-year regimen that improves relapse-free and overall survival but has significant toxicity. A quality-of-life--adjusted survival (QAS) analysis analysis of two cooperative group phase III trials, E1684 and E1690/S9111/C9190, was performed, incorporating patient values (utilities) for the toxicity of IFN alpha 2b treatment and melanoma recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quality-Adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity methodology was used with melanoma patient utilities and trial data to estimate the effect of IFN alpha 2b on QAS. The increase or decrease in QAS that patients could expect from treatment was estimated based on their utilities. Eleven utility predictor questions were tested to identify patients with utilities that result in decreased QAS.
RESULTS: Using E1684 data, IFN alpha 2b would result in an increase in QAS for all sets of patient utilities. This benefit was significant (P <.05) for 16% of patients. Using E1690/S9111/C9190 data, 77% of patients would experience a benefit in QAS from IFN alpha 2b and 23% would experience a decrease in QAS; neither of these effects was statistically significant. Using utility predictors and the E1690/S9111/C9190 analysis, a decision rule was formulated that helps identify patients in whom IFN alpha 2b may detract from QAS.
CONCLUSION: Most patients experienced improvement in QAS in both trials, but this benefit was statistically significant in only 16% of patients in E1684. Change in QAS depends more on the utility for IFN alpha 2b toxicity than on the utility for melanoma recurrence. Cancer patients probably have higher utilities for IFN alpha 2b toxicity than members of the general population and will tend to favor IFN alpha 2b treatment as a result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11870174     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  13 in total

1.  Quality-adjusted survival of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone among treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma: a quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis.

Authors:  David F McDermott; Ruchit Shah; Komal Gupte-Singh; Javier Sabater; Linlin Luo; Marc Botteman; Sumati Rao; Meredith M Regan; Michael Atkins
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Population preference values for treatment outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a cross-sectional utility study.

Authors:  Kathleen M Beusterien; John Davies; Michael Leach; David Meiklejohn; Jessica L Grinspan; Alison O'Toole; Steve Bramham-Jones
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 4.  Cost effectiveness and cost utility of adjuvant interferon alpha in cutaneous melanoma: a review.

Authors:  Ralph Crott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Analyzing oncology clinical trial data using the Q-TWiST method: clinical importance and sources for health state preference data.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; David Feeny; Timothy L Hunt; Bernard F Cole
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Adjuvant high-dose interferon for cutaneous melanoma is most beneficial for patients with early stage III disease.

Authors:  Daniel A Anaya; Yan Xing; Lei Feng; Xuelin Huang; Luis H Camacho; Merrick I Ross; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jeffrey E Lee; Paul F Mansfield; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of interferon-alpha in malignant melanoma: results from randomised trial.

Authors:  S Dixon; S J Walters; L Turner; B W Hancock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Adjuvant interferon alfa for melanoma: new evidence-based treatment recommendations?

Authors:  A Hauschild
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Societal preference values for advanced melanoma health states in the United Kingdom and Australia.

Authors:  K M Beusterien; S M Szabo; S Kotapati; J Mukherjee; A Hoos; P Hersey; M R Middleton; A R Levy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Adjuvant treatment of melanoma.

Authors:  J A Moreno Nogueira; M Valero Arbizu; R Pérez Temprano
Journal:  ISRN Dermatol       Date:  2013-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.