Literature DB >> 11870172

Improved outcome of allogeneic transplantation in high-risk multiple myeloma patients after nonmyeloablative conditioning.

Ashraf Badros1, Bart Barlogie, Eric Siegel, Michele Cottler-Fox, Maurizio Zangari, Athanasios Fassas, Christopher Morris, Elias Anaissie, Frits Van Rhee, Guido Tricot.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present our experience with relapsed and recently diagnosed patients with high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) receiving immunosuppressive, nonmyeloablative melphalan (MEL)-based conditioning regimens (mini-allograft). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one MM patients received allografts from HLA-matched siblings (n = 25) or unrelated donors (n = 6) using a mini-allograft. Seventeen had progressive disease (PD) and 14 had responsive disease (RD) (six with primary RD and eight with responsive relapse). Thirty patients had received one (n = 13) or two or more (n = 17) prior autologous transplantations (ATs). Median age was 56 years (range, 38 to 69 years). Twenty-one patients had chromosome 13 abnormality. Two patients were hemodialysis dependent. Blood and bone marrow grafts were administered to 28 and three patients, respectively. Donor lymphocyte infusions were given to 18 patients either to attain full donor chimerism (n = 6) or to eradicate residual disease (n = 12).
RESULTS: By day 100, 25 (89%) of 28 patients were full donor chimeras, one was a mixed chimera, and two had autologous reconstitution. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) developed in 18 patients (58%), and 10 progressed to chronic GVHD (limited in six and extensive in four). At a median follow-up of 6 months, 19 (61%) of 31 patients achieved complete/near complete remission. Twelve patients (39%) have died: three of PD, three of early treatment-related mortality (TRM) (before day 100), and six of late TRM. Median overall survival (OS) was 15 months. At 1 year, there was a significantly longer event-free survival (86% v 31%, P =.01) and OS (86% v 48%, P =.04) when a mini-allograft was performed after one versus two or more prior ATs, respectively. When compared with historical MM controls (n = 93) receiving conventional allografts, early TRM was significantly lower (10% v 29%, P =.03), and OS at 1 year was better (71% v 45%; P =.08) in the mini-allograft MM patients.
CONCLUSION: Mini-allograft induced excellent disease control in MM patients with high-risk disease, but is still associated with a significant GVHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11870172     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy strategies for multiple myeloma: the present and the future.

Authors:  Frederick L Locke; Taiga Nishihori; Melissa Alsina; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Yvonne A Efebera; Sofia R Qureshi; Suzanne M Cole; Rima Saliba; Matteo Pelosini; Ronak M Patel; Ebru Koca; Floralyn L Mendoza; Michael Wang; Jatin Shah; Amin Alousi; Chitra Hosing; Uday Popat; Partow Kebriaei; Paolo Anderlini; Issa F Khouri; Richard Champlin; Sergio Giralt; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Recent developments in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  William I Bensinger
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Nonmyeloablative unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation to treat patients with poor-risk, relapsed, or refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  George E Georges; Michael B Maris; David G Maloney; Brenda M Sandmaier; Mohamed L Sorror; Judith A Shizuru; Thoralf Lange; Edward D Agura; Benedetto Bruno; Peter A McSweeney; Michael A Pulsipher; Thomas R Chauncey; Marco Mielcarek; Barry E Storer; Rainer Storb
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  The role of high-dose chemotherapy supported by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: implications for nursing.

Authors:  Anna Liza Rodriguez; Joseph D Tariman; Toreend Enecio; Stella Marie Estrella
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.027

Review 6.  Therapy strategies for multiple myeloma: current status.

Authors:  Heinz Gisslinger; Mathias Kees
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  A Phase II trial of autologous stem cell transplantation followed by mini-allogeneic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple myeloma: an analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ECOG E4A98 and E1A97.

Authors:  David H Vesole; Lijun Zhang; Neal Flomenberg; Philip R Greipp; Hillard M Lazarus; Carol A Huff
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Current status of hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult patients with hematologic diseases and solid tumors in Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Imamura; Shigetaka Asano; Mine Harada; Yasuo Ikeda; Koji Kato; Shunichi Kato; Keisei Kawa; Seiji Kojima; Yasuo Morishima; Yoshihisa Morishita; Tatsutoshi Nakahata; Jun Okamura; Shinichiro Okamoto; Shintaro Shiobara; Mitsune Tanimoto; Masahiro Tsuchida; Yoshiko Atsuta; Kazuhito Yamamoto; Junji Tanaka; Nobuyuki Hamajima; Yoshihisa Kodera
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: what place, if any?

Authors:  Sergio Giralt; Guenther Koehne
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 10.  Emerging therapies for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Klaus Podar; Yu-Tzu Tai; Teru Hideshima; Sonia Vallet; Paul G Richardson; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Expert Opin Emerg Drugs       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.