Literature DB >> 11870162

Marginal decrease in mortality and marked increase in incidence as a result of neuroblastoma screening at 6 months of age: cohort study in seven prefectures in Japan.

Keiko Yamamoto1, Shigeru Ohta, Etsuro Ito, Yutaka Hayashi, Tadashi Asami, Osamu Mabuchi, Masamune Higashigawa, Masako Tanimura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the usefulness of 6-month screening for neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cumulative incidence rates (IRs) and cumulative mortality rates (MRs) of neuroblastoma in children younger than 60 months of age were analyzed for control (n = 713,025), qualitative screening (Qual Screen, n = 1,142,519), and quantitative screening (Quan Screen, n = 550,331) cohorts, and for Screened and Unscreened subgroups within screening cohorts.
RESULTS: IRs (per 100,000) for infants aged 6 to 11 months were 1.12 in Control, 5.69 in Qual Screen (P <.0001), and 17.81 in Quan Screen (P <.0001); IRs for children aged 12 to 59 months were 7.29 in Control, 5.86 in Qual Screen (P =.28), and 6.36 in Quan Screen (P =.60). IRs for children aged 12 to 59 months in Unscreened or Screened subgroups remained at the same level. When patients diagnosed at younger than 6 months of age were excluded, the MR (per 100,000) under 60 months for Control was 4.21; those in Unscreened and Screened subgroups were 3.84 and 2.53 in Qual Screen (P =.30), and 3.20 and 1.97 in Quan Screen (P =.73), respectively; MRs between Control and Unscreened subgroups revealed no significant differences (P =.89 in Qual Screen, P =.85 in Quan Screen).
CONCLUSION: Six-month screening resulted in a marked increase in incidence for infants with no significant decrease in incidence for children older than 1 year of age. A decrease in mortality was observed, but it was not significant. The usefulness of screening is questionable, because the decrease of mortality should be balanced against the adverse effect of overdiagnosis and the psychological burden on parents and children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11870162     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  14 in total

Review 1.  Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; David F Ransohoff; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Screening for coronary heart disease: cardiology through the oncology looking glass.

Authors:  D Douglas Miller; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Prenatal and perinatal risk factors for neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bluhm; Dawn Elizabeth McNeil; Sven Cnattingius; Gloria Gridley; Laure El Ghormli; Joseph F Fraumeni
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Spontaneous regression of neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Garrett M Brodeur
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 5.  Mechanisms of neuroblastoma regression.

Authors:  Garrett M Brodeur; Rochelle Bagatell
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Heterogeneous subgroups in human neuroblastoma for clinically relevant risk stratification.

Authors:  Eiso Hiyama; Hiroaki Yamaoka; Satoshi Kondo; Akihiro Yoneda; Tatsuro Tajiri; Masahiro Fukuzawa; Masahiko Sugiyama; Yutaka Hayashi; Fumiaki Sasaki; Megu Ohtaki
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Autoantibody signature differentiates Wilms tumor patients from neuroblastoma patients.

Authors:  Jana Schmitt; Andreas Keller; Nasenien Nourkami-Tutdibi; Sabrina Heisel; Nunja Habel; Petra Leidinger; Nicole Ludwig; Manfred Gessler; Norbert Graf; Frank Berthold; Hans-Peter Lenhof; Eckart Meese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  MYCN gene amplification is a powerful prognostic factor even in infantile neuroblastoma detected by mass screening.

Authors:  T Iehara; H Hosoi; K Akazawa; Y Matsumoto; K Yamamoto; S Suita; T Tajiri; T Kusafuka; E Hiyama; M Kaneko; F Sasaki; T Sugimoto; T Sawada
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Secular trends in neuroblastoma mortality before and after the cessation of national mass screening in Japan.

Authors:  Kota Katanoda; Kunihiko Hayashi; Keiko Yamamoto; Tomotaka Sobue
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Effectiveness of nationwide screening program for neuroblastoma in Japan.

Authors:  Akinori Hisashige
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.