Literature DB >> 11870120

The impact of the embryo transfer catheter on the pregnancy rate in IVF.

Hans G I van Weering1, Roel Schats, Joseph McDonnell, Jacqueline M Vink, Jan P W Vermeiden, Peter G A Hompes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess whether the type of embryo transfer set used for embryo transfer affects the ongoing pregnancy rate in IVF.
METHODS: The TDT set was compared with the K-soft 5000 in a large, prospective, randomized study. Patients were randomized moments before transfer by drawing a consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque envelope indicating the catheter to be used.
RESULTS: 2059 embryo transfers in 1296 patients were analysed. The ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the K-soft group. If the first transfer of a patient (n = 1296) within this study period was analysed, the ongoing pregnancy rates were 27.1 versus 20.5% (P = 0.006). If the analysis is limited to patients that underwent their very first transfer ever (n = 607), the ongoing pregnancy rates were 30.3 versus 20.0% (P = 0.003) in favour of the K-soft.
CONCLUSION: We conclude from these data that the type of embryo transfer set used for embryo transfer does affect the ongoing pregnancy rate and that the impact of the variable transfer catheter on the ongoing pregnancy rate increases when the a priori chance of pregnancy increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11870120     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.3.666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Assisted reproduction outcomes after embryo transfers requiring a malleable stylet.

Authors:  Gian Mario Tiboni; Enrica Concetta Colangelo; Emiliana Leonzio; Elisabetta Gabriele
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany L Rhodes; Thomas P McCoy; H Lee Higdon; William R Boone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Influence of Catheter Type and Tenaculum Use on Intrauterine Insemination Outcome.

Authors:  Pinar Gulsen Coban; Ayla Sargin Oruc; Meryem Kuru Pekcan; Hasan Ali Inal; Necati Hancerliogullari; Nafiye Yilmaz
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-10-12

4.  Effect of embryo transfer depth on IVF/ICSI outcomes: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Robab Davar; Seyedeh Mahsa Poormoosavi; Fereshteh Mohseni; Sima Janati
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2020-09-20

5.  Embryo afterloading: a refinement in embryo transfer technique that may increase clinical pregnancy.

Authors:  Adrienne B Neithardt; James H Segars; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Jeffrey L McKeeby
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Effect of the afterloaded external guidance embryo transfer technique on pregnancy rates in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Nafiye Yılmaz; Ayla Sargın Oruç; Tugba Zeyrek; Umit Görkem; Hasan Ali Inal; Yaprak Engin-Üstün; Cavidan Gülerman
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-09-01

7.  The impact of the depth of embryo replacement on IVF outcome.

Authors:  Arianna Pacchiarotti; Mohamed A Mohamed; Giulietta Micara; Daniela Tranquilli; Antonella Linari; Salomè M B Espinola; Cesare Aragona
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Comparison between Conventional Blind Embryo Transfer and Embryo Transfer Based on Previously Measured Uterine Length.

Authors:  Nasrin Saharkhiz; Roshan Nikbakht; Saghar Salehpour
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-11-01

9.  A prospective study comparing two embryo-transfer soft catheters.

Authors:  Emily De Conto; Artur K Schuster; Vanessa K Genro; Rita Chapon; Daniela S da Silva; João Sabino Cunha-Filho
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-06-01

10.  Embryo location in the uterus during embryo transfer: An in vitro simulation.

Authors:  Jinqiu Mo; Qing Yang; Lan Xia; Zhihong Niu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.