Literature DB >> 11869912

Identification of individual walking patterns using time discrete and time continuous data sets.

W I Schöllhorn1, B M Nigg, D J Stefanyshyn, W Liu.   

Abstract

Scientific studies typically treat data by studying effects of groups. Clinical therapy typically treats patients on a subject specific basis. Consequently, scientific and clinical attempts to help patients are often not coordinated. The purposes of this study were (a) to identify subject and group specific locomotion characteristics quantitatively, using time discrete and time continuous data and (b) to assess the advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches. Kinematic and kinetic gait pattern of 13 female subjects walking in dress shoes with different heel heights (14, 37, 54 and 85 mm) were analysed. The results of this study showed that subject specific gait characteristics could be better identified with the time continuous than with the time discrete approach. Thus, the time continuous approach using artificial networks is an effective tool for identifying subject and group specific locomotion characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11869912     DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00193-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  21 in total

Review 1.  Neural network modelling and dynamical system theory: are they relevant to study the governing dynamics of association football players?

Authors:  Aviroop Dutt-Mazumder; Chris Button; Anthony Robins; Roger Bartlett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Adaptive and phase transition behavior in performance of discrete multi-articular actions by degenerate neurobiological systems.

Authors:  Robert Rein; Keith Davids; Chris Button
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Revealing the unique features of each individual's muscle activation signatures.

Authors:  Jeroen Aeles; Fabian Horst; Sebastian Lapuschkin; Lilian Lacourpaille; François Hug
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Intra-individual gait patterns across different time-scales as revealed by means of a supervised learning model using kernel-based discriminant regression.

Authors:  Fabian Horst; Alexander Eekhoff; Karl M Newell; Wolfgang I Schöllhorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Immediate effects of EVA midsole resilience and upper shoe structure on running biomechanics: a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Andrea N Onodera; Isabel Cn Sacco; Wilson P Gavião Neto; Maria Isabel Roveri; Wagner R Oliveira
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Finding hens in a haystack: Consistency of movement patterns within and across individual laying hens maintained in large groups.

Authors:  C Rufener; J Berezowski; F Maximiano Sousa; Y Abreu; L Asher; M J Toscano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Soft tissue vibration dynamics after an unexpected impact.

Authors:  Aaron Martínez; Christopher K-Y Lam; Vinzenz von Tscharner; Benno M Nigg
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-01

8.  Functional vs. Traditional Analysis in Biomechanical Gait Data: An Alternative Statistical Approach.

Authors:  Jihong Park; Matthew K Seeley; Devin Francom; C Shane Reese; J Ty Hopkins
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  The Gaitprint: Identifying Individuals by Their Running Style.

Authors:  Christian Weich; Manfred M Vieten
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Using wearable sensors to classify subject-specific running biomechanical gait patterns based on changes in environmental weather conditions.

Authors:  Nizam Uddin Ahamed; Dylan Kobsar; Lauren Benson; Christian Clermont; Russell Kohrs; Sean T Osis; Reed Ferber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.