Literature DB >> 11869628

Operative procedures for fissure in ano.

R Nelson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Operative techniques commonly used for fissure in ano include: anal stretch, open lateral sphincterotomy, closed lateral sphincterotomy, posterior midline sphincterotomy and to a lesser extent dermal flap coverage of the fissure. Reports of direct comparisons between operative techniques for anal fissure are variable in their results. These reports are either subject to selection bias (in non-randomized studies) or observer bias (in all studies) or have inadequate numbers of patients enrolled to answer the question of efficacy.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the best technique for fissure surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register [Cochrane2000] and MEDLINE (1965-2000) were searched. The list of cited references in all included reports and several study authors also were helpful in finding additional comparative studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All reports in which there was a direct comparison between at least two operative techniques were reviewed and when more than one report existed for any given pair, that report was included. If crude data were not presented in the report, the authors were contacted and crude data obtained. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The two most commonly used end points in all reported studies were persistence of the fissure and post operative incontinence of flatus. These are the only two endpoints included in the meta-analysis. MAIN
RESULTS: Anal stretch has a higher risk of fissure persistence than internal sphincterotomy and also a significantly higher risk of minor incontinence than sphincterotomy. The combined results of open versus closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy show little difference between the two procedures both in fissure persistence and risk of incontinence. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Anal stretch and posterior midline internal sphincterotomy should probably be abandoned in the treatment of chronic anal fissure in adults. For those patients requiring surgery for anal fissure, open and closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy appear to be equally efficacious. More data are needed to assess the effectiveness of posterior internal sphincterotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11869628     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  6 in total

1.  Treatment of anal fissure.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-16

Review 2.  Treatment of fissure in ano- revisited.

Authors:  Pravid J Gupta
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 3.  Controversies in the treatment of common anal problems.

Authors:  Ismail Sagap; Feza-H Remzi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Comparison of the effectiveness of two treatment modalities for chronic anal fissure: Botox versus sphincterotomy.

Authors:  Coskun Cakir; Ufuk Oguz Idiz; Ibrahim Aydin; Deniz Firat; Abdulhakim İbrahim Ulusoy; Pinar Yazici
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-09-28

5.  Subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy (SLIS)--a safe technique for treatment of chronic anal fissure.

Authors:  Jim S Khan; Neil Tan; Dariush Nikkhah; Andrew J G Miles
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A study of fecal incontinence in patients with chronic anal fissure: prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy.

Authors:  Magdy M A Elsebae
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.282

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.