Literature DB >> 11868051

Coronary calcium and cardiovascular event risk: evaluation by age- and sex-specific quartiles.

Nathan D Wong1, Matthew J Budoff, Jose Pio, Robert C Detrano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wide differences in risks for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events associated with coronary artery calcium (CAC) have been reported. We evaluated the relationship of the coronary calcium quartile, on the basis of age-sex cut points from a large sample of asymptomatic patients, to CVD events as a possible standardized means for reporting event risks associated with CAC, in comparison with quartiles of absolute CAC scores.
METHODS: We applied age/sex-stratified cut points to 928 asymptomatic men and women (mean age 54 years) followed up for an average of 3.3 years, during which 28 CVD events were confirmed. Cox regression was used to evaluate the relation of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles (compared with the 1st), with and without age/sex stratification, to the risk of future CVD events.
RESULTS: The number of events (and percent incidence) that occurred in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles of coronary calcium was 4 (0.9%), 2 (2.0%), 9 (4.5%), and 13 (6.4%) events (P =.001) for the age/sex-stratified quartiles and 4 (1.0%), 0 (0%), 7 (3.0%), and 17 (7.3%) for the absolute score quartiles (P =.001). In multivariable analysis adjusted for other risk factors, there was a modest increase in CVD events seen among those in the 3rd quartile (relative risk [RR] 4.3, P =.02), with a greater risk seen among those in the 4th quartile (RR 6.0, P <.01) (compared with the 1st quartile). This did not differ from use of absolute CAC scores, where RR = 2.6 (P =.14) for the 3rd quartile and RR = 6.4 (P <.01) for the 4th quartile.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that age-sex stratification by percentile rank of CAC is as accurate as absolute CAC scores for predicting CVD events in asymptomatic persons. Ongoing longitudinal population-based studies will provide more definitive data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11868051     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.120409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  15 in total

Review 1.  MDCT evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease: what should radiologists know?

Authors:  Hye Rin Kim; Seung Min Yoo; Ji Young Rho; Hwa Yeon Lee; Charles S White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Visualising noncalcified coronary plaques by CT.

Authors:  Alexander W Leber; Andreas Knez; Alexander Becker; Christoph Becker; Maximilian Reiser; Gerhard Steinbeck; Peter Boekstegers
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Coronary artery calcium screening in persons with metabolic syndrome and diabetes: implications for prevention.

Authors:  David M Tehrani; Shaista Malik; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Coronary artery calcium, brain function and structure: the AGES-Reykjavik Study.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Vidal; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Maria K Jonsdottir; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Olafur Kjartansson; Melissa E Garcia; Mark A van Buchem; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  The role of atherosclerosis imaging in redefining normal and abnormal cholesterol values, and risk reduction in primary prevention statin trials.

Authors:  Harvey S Hecht
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  A supervised classification-based method for coronary calcium detection in non-contrast CT.

Authors:  Uday Kurkure; Deepak R Chittajallu; Gerd Brunner; Yen H Le; Ioannis A Kakadiaris
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Update on using coronary calcium screening by computed tomography to measure risk for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Brad H Thompson; William Stanford
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Vascular calcification in diabetes: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Janet K Snell-Bergeon; Matthew J Budoff; John E Hokanson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  Coronary artery calcium scores and cardiovascular risk factors in 31,545 asymptomatic Korean adults.

Authors:  Shin Yi Jang; Sung Mok Kim; Jidong Sung; Soo Jin Cho; Yeon Hyeon Choe
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-sex-race/ethnicity percentiles: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Khurram Nasir; Robyn L McClelland; Robert Detrano; Nathan Wong; Roger S Blumenthal; George Kondos; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.